Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Katharina Wzietek
dblp:371/1436
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0003-2347-9181ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-robot interaction
robot acceptance |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Imagination vs. Reality: Investigating the Acceptance and Preferred Anthropomorphism in Service HRI · HRI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user study · 0.8exploratory comparison · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Imagination vs. Reality: Investigating the Acceptance and Preferred Anthropomorphism in Service HRIabstractWhile the use of robots in public spaces is increasing, still few studies explore the resulting everyday human-robot interactions (HRI). The present study sought to bridge the disparity between real-world interactions and the frequently examined hypothetical interactions. To do so, we investigate the imagined and actual interaction with an ice cream serving robot. In two studies and an exploratory study comparison, we examined user acceptance and preference for the degree of anthropomorphic appearance. Although a typical human service task was taken over by a robot, an industrial robot was preferred according to participants' ratings in both studies. Moreover, both studies demonstrated that robot enthusiasm significantly relates to participants' acceptance of the robot for the task. Besides these commonalities, the results showed also that while humans were preferred over robots in the imagined setting, no clear preference was found in the real-life setting. Additional analyses compared the free text answers of the two studies and provided insights into participants' general attitudes toward robots in the workforce. In line with the higher preferences for humans over robots in the imagined setting, considerably more participants mentioned a better customer experience with humans as important in the imagined study compared to the participants who interacted with the robot. The studies strikingly demonstrated that imaginary settings yield similar outcomes to those where participants physically engage with the robot in certain aspects, such as their preference for anthropomorphism. However, this phenomenon does not appear to hold for other facets, such as their favored service agent. Katharina Wzietek, Felix W. Siebert, Eileen Roesler |
HRI | 1 |