Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Junaid Bajwa

dblp:371/2354 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0003-0817-6553ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 77% Design research and methods · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction
vision language model
0.812024
Multimodal Healthcare AI: Identifying and Designing Clinically Relevant Vision-Language Applications for Radiology · CHI 2024
Design research and methods
participatory design
0.212024
Multimodal Healthcare AI: Identifying and Designing Clinically Relevant Vision-Language Applications for Radiology · CHI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.8design process · 0.8co-design · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Multimodal Healthcare AI: Identifying and Designing Clinically Relevant Vision-Language Applications for Radiology
abstract
Recent advances in AI combine large language models (LLMs) with vision encoders that bring forward unprecedented technical capabilities to leverage for a wide range of healthcare applications. Focusing on the domain of radiology, vision-language models (VLMs) achieve good performance results for tasks such as generating radiology findings based on a patient’s medical image, or answering visual questions (e.g., “Where are the nodules in this chest X-ray?”). However, the clinical utility of potential applications of these capabilities is currently underexplored. We engaged in an iterative, multidisciplinary design process to envision clinically relevant VLM interactions, and co-designed four VLM use concepts: Draft Report Generation, Augmented Report Review, Visual Search and Querying, and Patient Imaging History Highlights. We studied these concepts with 13 radiologists and clinicians who assessed the VLM concepts as valuable, yet articulated many design considerations. Reflecting on our findings, we discuss implications for integrating VLM capabilities in radiology, and for healthcare AI more generally.
Nur Yildirim, Hannah Richardson, Maria Wetscherek, Junaid Bajwa, Joseph Jacob, Mark A. Pinnock, Daniel C. Castro, Shruthi Bannur, Stephanie L. Hyland, Pratik Ghosh, Mercy Ranjit, Kenza Bouzid, Anton Schwaighofer, Fernando Pérez-García, Harshita Sharma, Ozan Oktay, Matthew P. Lungren, Javier Alvarez-Valle, Aditya V. Nori, Anja Thieme
CHI4