Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tsun Wai Siu
dblp:371/4924
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 77% Video understanding and tracking · 23% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
mirror detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ZOOM: Learning Video Mirror Detection with Extremely-Weak Supervision · AAAI 2024 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › video analysis
video mirror detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ZOOM: Learning Video Mirror Detection with Extremely-Weak Supervision · AAAI 2024 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › temporal modeling
temporal consistency modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | ZOOM: Learning Video Mirror Detection with Extremely-Weak Supervision · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weak supervision · 1.5temporal similarity-contrast modeling · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | ZOOM: Learning Video Mirror Detection with Extremely-Weak SupervisionabstractMirror detection is an active research topic in computer vision. However, all existing mirror detectors learn mirror representations from large-scale pixel-wise datasets, which are tedious and expensive to obtain. Although weakly-supervised learning has been widely explored in related topics, we note that popular weak supervision signals (e.g., bounding boxes, scribbles, points) still require some efforts from the user to locate the target objects, with a strong assumption that the images to annotate always contain the target objects. Such an assumption may result in the over-segmentation of mirrors. Our key idea of this work is that the existence of mirrors over a time period may serve as a weak supervision to train a mirror detector, for two reasons. First, if a network can predict the existence of mirrors, it can essentially locate the mirrors. Second, we observe that the reflected contents of a mirror tend to be similar to those in adjacent frames, but exhibit considerable contrast to regions in far-away frames (e.g., non-mirror frames). To this end, in this paper, we propose ZOOM, the first method to learn robust mirror representations from extremely-weak annotations of per-frame ZerO-One Mirror indicators in videos. The key insight of ZOOM is to model the similarity and contrast (between mirror and non-mirror regions) in temporal variations to locate and segment the mirrors. To this end, we propose a novel fusion strategy to leverage temporal consistency information for mirror localization, and a novel temporal similarity-contrast modeling module for mirror segmentation. We construct a new video mirror dataset for training and evaluation. Experimental results under new and standard metrics show that ZOOM performs favorably against existing fully-supervised mirror detection methods. Ke Xu 0010, Tsun Wai Siu, Rynson W. H. Lau |
AAAI | 2 |