Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wenqi Dang
dblp:371/5174
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning paradigms · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% Deep learning architectures and training · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
classifier calibration |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Inverse Weight-Balancing for Deep Long-Tailed Learning · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
class imbalance |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Inverse Weight-Balancing for Deep Long-Tailed Learning · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › class imbalance
long-tailed learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Inverse Weight-Balancing for Deep Long-Tailed Learning · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
weight balancing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Inverse Weight-Balancing for Deep Long-Tailed Learning · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
inverse weight-balancing · 0.8distribution alignment · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Inverse Weight-Balancing for Deep Long-Tailed LearningabstractThe performance of deep learning models often degrades rapidly when faced with imbalanced data characterized by a long-tailed distribution. Researchers have found that the fully connected layer trained by cross-entropy loss has large weight-norms for classes with many samples, but not for classes with few samples. How to address the data imbalance problem with both the encoder and the classifier seems an under-researched problem. In this paper, we propose an inverse weight-balancing (IWB) approach to guide model training and alleviate the data imbalance problem in two stages. In the first stage, an encoder and classifier (the fully connected layer) are trained using conventional cross-entropy loss. In the second stage, with a fixed encoder, the classifier is finetuned through an adaptive distribution for IWB in the decision space. Unlike existing inverse image frequency that implements a multiplicative margin adjustment transformation in the classification layer, our approach can be interpreted as an adaptive distribution alignment strategy using not only the class-wise number distribution but also the sample-wise difficulty distribution in both encoder and classifier. Experiments show that our method can greatly improve performance on imbalanced datasets such as CIFAR100-LT with different imbalance factors, ImageNet-LT, and iNaturelists2018. Wenqi Dang, Weisheng Dong, Xin Li 0005, Guangming Shi |
AAAI | 1 |