Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ismael Hishon-Rezaizadeh

dblp:373/6469 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-3135-9633ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 50% Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security
blockchain scalability
0.812024
Reckle Trees: Updatable Merkle Batch Proofs with Applications · CCS 2024
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › commitment schemes
vector commitment
0.812024
Reckle Trees: Updatable Merkle Batch Proofs with Applications · CCS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

recursive arguments · 0.8merkle tree · 0.8canonical hashing · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Robust Double Auctions for Resource Allocation
Arthur Lazzaretti, Charalampos Papamanthou, Ismael Hishon-Rezaizadeh
FC3
2024 Reckle Trees: Updatable Merkle Batch Proofs with Applications
abstract
We propose Reckle trees, a new vector commitment based on succinct RECursive arguments and MerKLE trees. Reckle trees' distinguishing feature is their support for succinct batch proofs that are updatable - enabling new applications in the blockchain setting where a proof needs to be computed and efficiently maintained over a moving stream of blocks. Our technical approach is based on embedding the computation of the batch hash inside the recursive Merkle verification via a hash-based accumulator called canonical hashing. Due to this embedding, our batch proofs can be updated in logarithmic time, whenever a Merkle leaf (belonging to the batch or not) changes, by maintaining a data structure that stores previously-computed recursive proofs. Assuming enough parallelism, our batch proofs are also computable in O(log n) parallel time - independent of the size of the batch. As a natural extension of Reckle trees, we also introduce Reckle+ trees. Reckle+ trees provide updatable and succinct proofs for certain types of Map/Reduce computations. In this setting, a prover can commit to a memory M and produce a succinct proof for a Map/Reduce computation over a subset I of M. The proof can be efficiently updated whenever I or M changes.
Charalampos Papamanthou, Shravan Srinivasan, Nicolas Gailly, Ismael Hishon-Rezaizadeh, Andrus Salumets, Stjepan Golemac
CCS4