Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Angelina Krupp
dblp:374/3624
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-6045-8935ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 50% Human-robot interaction · 50% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-robot interaction
psychological needs |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | The Challenge to Design for Relatedness Experiences: An Explorative Investigation of Five Relatedness Technologies from a Psychological Needs Perspective · CHI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantitative analysis · 1.0qualitative analysis · 1.0online study · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | The Challenge to Design for Relatedness Experiences: An Explorative Investigation of Five Relatedness Technologies from a Psychological Needs PerspectiveabstractSo-called relatedness technologies aim to create relatedness experiences between people over distance. Typically, such technologies focus on implicit or expressive interaction, as opposed to the explicit, information-focused interaction of conventional communication technologies. Based on psychological theory, previous research has identified different design strategies for relatedness technologies such as awareness, expressivity, or gift giving. However, despite this profound theoretical understanding, designing for a fulfilling relatedness experience remains a challenging task and often conflicts with other psychological needs, such as autonomy or security. This research explores the specific potentials and barriers to the use and acceptance of relatedness technologies. Based on a comparative evaluation of five different relatedness concepts in an online study (N = 221) combining quantitative and qualitative data, we identified overarching patterns of promising design strategies for particular user groups and revealed overall need fulfillment as a central predictor of the intention to use the technology. Angelina Krupp, Daniel Ullrich, Sarah Diefenbach |
CHI | 1 |