Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Camélia Prost

dblp:374/8307 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0006-7741-0958ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Interaction techniques and input · 62% Accessibility and assistive technology · 38%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interaction techniques and input
touch interaction
0.812024
Impact of Fingernails Length on Mobile Tactile Interaction · CHI 2024
Accessibility and assistive technology › mobile accessibility
accessible mobile interaction
0.212024
Impact of Fingernails Length on Mobile Tactile Interaction · CHI 2024
Accessibility and assistive technology
inclusive design
0.212024
Impact of Fingernails Length on Mobile Tactile Interaction · CHI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interview study · 0.8controlled experiment · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Impact of Fingernails Length on Mobile Tactile Interaction
abstract
Mobile users have fingernails of different lengths. This paper measures the impact of fingernail length on the use of tactile mobile phones. We first conducted interviews with participants wearing long fingernails. They reported difficulties and non-satisfactory coping strategies to hold their phone securely and acquire targets accurately. We then conducted three experiments comparing different lengths of fingernails (0 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm). Our results quantify the drop in comfort and efficiency. We measured the range of incidental pitch angle on the surface, the comfortable and useful area of the thumb, and the target acquisition efficiency. 10 mm fingernails consistently decrease by 57% the range of the finger pitch angle, by 36% the comfortable area of the thumb, and by 24% the throughput when acquiring targets. This paper contributes guidelines for future inclusive devices and techniques to also support users with long fingernails.
Céline Coutrix, Camélia Prost
CHI2