Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chase H. Mathis
dblp:374/9222
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0006-1765-2912ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Health and well-being technologies · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection › healthcare privacy
reproductive privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | "I Deleted It After the Overturn of Roe v. Wade": Understanding Women's Privacy Concerns Toward Period-Tracking Apps in the Post Roe v. Wade Era · CHI 2024 |
Health and well-being technologies › women's health
women's health technology |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | "I Deleted It After the Overturn of Roe v. Wade": Understanding Women's Privacy Concerns Toward Period-Tracking Apps in the Post Roe v. Wade Era · CHI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vignette survey · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | "I Deleted It After the Overturn of Roe v. Wade": Understanding Women's Privacy Concerns Toward Period-Tracking Apps in the Post Roe v. Wade EraabstractThe overturn of Roe v. Wade has taken away the constitutional right to abortion. Prior work shows that period-tracking apps’ data practices can be used to detect pregnancy and abortion, hence putting women at risk of being prosecuted. It is unclear how much women know about the privacy practices of such apps and how concerned they are after the overturn. Such knowledge is critical to designing effective strategies for stakeholders to enhance women’s reproductive privacy. We conducted an online 183-participant vignette survey with US women from states with diverse policies on abortion. Participants were significantly concerned about the privacy practices of the period-tracking apps, such as data access by law enforcement and third parties. However, participants felt uninformed and powerless about risk mitigation practices. We provide several recommendations to enhance women’s privacy awareness toward their period-tracking practices. Jiaxun Cao, Hiba Laabadli, Chase H. Mathis, Rebecca D. Stern, Pardis Emami Naeini |
CHI | 3 |