Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Antonio Torres-Agüero

dblp:375/0215 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-4186-3032ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection › privacy compliance › consent
consent management
0.812024
A Study of GDPR Compliance under the Transparency and Consent Framework · WWW 2024
Privacy and data protection › privacy compliance
GDPR compliance
0.812024
A Study of GDPR Compliance under the Transparency and Consent Framework · WWW 2024
Privacy and data protection › web privacy
online advertising privacy
0.812024
A Study of GDPR Compliance under the Transparency and Consent Framework · WWW 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

experimental measurement · 0.8cookie analysis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 A Study of GDPR Compliance under the Transparency and Consent Framework
abstract
This paper presents a study of GDPR compliance under the Interactive Advertising Bureau Europe's Transparency and Consent Framework (TCF). This framework provides digital advertising market participants a standard for sharing users' privacy consent choices. TCF is widely used across the Internet, and this paper presents a thorough experimental evaluation of both the compliance of websites with TCF and its impact on user privacy. We reviewed 2,230 websites that use TCF and accepted the automatic decline of user consent by our data collection system. Unlike previous work on GDPR compliance, we found that most websites using TCF properly record the user's consent choice. However, we found that 72.8% of the websites that were TCF compliant claimed legitimate interest as a rationale for overriding the consent choice. While legitimate interest is legal under GDPR, previous studies have shown that most users disagreed with how it is being used to collect data. Additionally, analysis of cookies set to the browsers indicates that TCF may not fully protect user privacy even when websites are compliant. Our research provides regulators and publishers with a data collection and analysis system to monitor compliance, detect non-compliance, and examine questionable practices of circumventing user consent choices using legitimate interest.
Antonio Torres-Agüero, Riley Grossman, Pritam Sen, Yi Chen 0001, Cristian Borcea
WWW2