Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rohit Jayanti
dblp:375/2998
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching › region matching
segment matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SegMASt3R: Geometry Grounded Segment Matching · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching › line matching
wide-baseline line matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SegMASt3R: Geometry Grounded Segment Matching · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
segment matching · 0.93d foundation model · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SegMASt3R: Geometry Grounded Segment MatchingabstractSegment matching is an important intermediate task in computer vision that establishes correspondences between semantically or geometrically coherent regions across images. Unlike keypoint matching, which focuses on localized features, segment matching captures structured regions, offering greater robustness to occlusions, lighting variations, and viewpoint changes. In this paper, we leverage the spatial understanding of 3D foundation models to tackle wide-baseline segment matching, a challenging setting involving extreme viewpoint shifts. We propose an architecture that uses the inductive bias of these 3D foundation models to match segments across image pairs with up to $180^\circ$ rotation. Extensive experiments show that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods, including the SAM2 video propagator and local feature matching methods, by up to 30\% on the AUPRC metric, on ScanNet++ and Replica datasets. We further demonstrate benefits of the proposed model on relevant downstream tasks, including 3D instance mapping and object-relative navigation. Rohit Jayanti, Swayam Agrawal, Vansh Garg, Siddharth Tourani, Muhammad Haris Khan, Sourav Garg, K. Madhava Krishna |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | QueSTMaps: Queryable Semantic Topological Maps for 3D Scene UnderstandingabstractRobotic tasks such as planning and navigation require a hierarchical semantic understanding of a scene, which could include multiple floors and rooms. Current methods primarily focus on object segmentation for 3D scene understanding. However, such methods struggle to segment out topological regions like "kitchen" in the scene. In this work, we introduce a two-step pipeline to solve this problem. First, we extract a topological map, i.e., floorplan of the indoor scene using a novel multi-channel occupancy representation. Then, we generate CLIP-aligned features and semantic labels for every room instance based on the objects it contains using a self-attention transformer. Our language-topology alignment supports natural language querying, e.g., a "place to cook" locates the "kitchen". We outperform the current state-of-the-art on room segmentation by ~20% and room classification by ~12%. Our detailed qualitative analysis and ablation studies provide insights into the problem of joint structural and semantic 3D scene understanding. Project Page: quest-maps.github.io Yash Mehan, Kumaraditya Gupta, Rohit Jayanti, Anirudh Govil, Sourav Garg, K. Madhava Krishna |
IROS | 3 |