Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Atharv Mahesh Mane

dblp:375/7201 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 50% 3D vision · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Interaction techniques and input · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding
3d visual grounding
0.912025
Ges3ViG : Incorporating Pointing Gestures into Language-Based 3D Visual Grounding for Embodied Reference Understanding · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual grounding
0.912025
Ges3ViG : Incorporating Pointing Gestures into Language-Based 3D Visual Grounding for Embodied Reference Understanding · CVPR 2025
Interaction techniques and input
gesture input
0.912025
Ges3ViG : Incorporating Pointing Gestures into Language-Based 3D Visual Grounding for Embodied Reference Understanding · CVPR 2025
Interaction techniques and input › gesture input
pointing gesture
0.912025
Ges3ViG : Incorporating Pointing Gestures into Language-Based 3D Visual Grounding for Embodied Reference Understanding · CVPR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multimodal transformer · 1.7data augmentation · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Ges3ViG : Incorporating Pointing Gestures into Language-Based 3D Visual Grounding for Embodied Reference Understanding
abstract
3-Dimensional Embodied Reference Understanding (3D-ERU) combines a language description and an accompanying pointing gesture to identify the most relevant target object in a 3D scene. Although prior work has explored pure language-based 3D grounding, there has been limited exploration of 3D-ERU, which also incorporates human pointing gestures. To address this gap, we introduce a data augmentation framework– Imputer, and use it to curate a new benchmark dataset– ImputeRefer for 3D-ERU, by incorporating human pointing gestures into existing 3D scene datasets that only contain language instructions. We also propose Ges3ViG, a novel model for 3D-ERU that achieves ~30% improvement in accuracy as compared to other 3D-ERU models and ~9% compared to other purely language-based 3D grounding models. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/AtharvMane/Ges3ViG.
Atharv Mahesh Mane, Dulanga Weerakoon, Vigneshwaran Subbaraju, Sougata Sen, Sanjay E. Sarma, Archan Misra
CVPR1
2024 Correlations between Multilingual Language Model Geometry and Crosslingual Transfer Performance
abstract
A common approach to interpreting multilingual language models is to evaluate their internal representations. For example, studies have found that languages occupy distinct subspaces in the models’ representation spaces, and geometric distances between languages often reflect linguistic properties such as language families and typological features. In our work, we investigate whether geometric distances between language representations correlate with zero-shot crosslingual transfer performance for POS-tagging and NER in three multilingual language models. We consider four distance metrics, including new metrics that identify a basis for a multilingual representation space that sorts axes based on their language-separability. We find that each distance metric either only moderately correlates or does not correlate with crosslingual transfer performance, and metrics do not generalize well across models, layers, and tasks. Although pairwise language separability is a reasonable predictor of crosslingual transfer, representational geometry overall is an inconsistent predictor for the crosslingual performance of multilingual language models.
Cheril Shah, Yashashree Chandak, Atharv Mahesh Mane, Ben Bergen 0001, Tyler A. Chang
LREC/COLING3