Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hansi Wang
dblp:375/7322
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-8369-5507ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 59% Information extraction and text analysis · 41% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Knowledge graphs · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › textual entailment
lexical entailment |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Enhancing Lexical Relation Mining with Structured Sememe Knowledge · ACL (1) 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation › semantic relations
lexical relation classification |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Enhancing Lexical Relation Mining with Structured Sememe Knowledge · ACL (1) 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation › semantic relations
lexical relation mining |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Enhancing Lexical Relation Mining with Structured Sememe Knowledge · ACL (1) 2026 |
Knowledge graphs
link prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How Sememic Components Can Benefit Link Prediction for Lexico-Semantic Knowledge Graphs? · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word sense disambiguation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Disambiguate Words like Composing Them: A Morphology-Informed Approach to Enhance Chinese Word Sense Disambiguation · ACL (1) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sememe tree construction · 1.0pre-trained language model · 1.0sememe prediction · 0.9sememe knowledge · 0.8morphology-informed modeling · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Enhancing Lexical Relation Mining with Structured Sememe KnowledgeabstractLexical Relation Mining (LRM) aims to identify and classify lexical relations between word pairs.In this paper, we focus on two subtypes of LRM: Lexical Relation Classification (LRC) and Lexical Entailment (LE).Existing top-performing methods for them rely heavily on Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) yet fail to distinguish nuanced lexical relations.From a linguistic perspective, intralexical treestructured sememe information can reflect interlexical relations.Inspired by this, we are motivated to explore leveraging such structured knowledge to enhance LRC and LE.We first propose an automated Sememe Tree Construction (STC) pipeline to predict sememe trees; Then, we present the SememeLRM method to fully leverage structured sememe knowledge; Experimental results show that it achieves a notable 1.6% improvement on average across benchmarks, even outperforming Large Language Model (LLM)-based methods that contain 20 times more parameters on most benchmarks.Further results also suggest that sememe trees predicted by our pipeline can rival the gold-standard in HowNet, extending their applicability to lexico-semantic computing.Overall, this paper presents a potentially generalizable framework for leveraging complete sememe trees and makes significant progress, helping to unlock the value of such intralexical knowledge in downstream tasks 1 . Hansi Wang, Qiliang Liang, Yang Liu 0124 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | LTRS: Improving Word Sense Disambiguation via Learning to Rank SensesabstractWord Sense Disambiguation (WSD) is a fundamental task critical for accurate semantic understanding. Conventional training strategies usually only consider predefined senses for target words and learn each of them from relatively limited instances, neglecting the influence of similar ones. To address these problems, we propose the method of Learning to Rank Senses (LTRS) to enhance the task. This method helps a model learn to represent and disambiguate senses from a broadened range of instances via ranking an expanded list of sense definitions. By employing LTRS, our model achieves a SOTA F1 score of 79.6% in Chinese WSD and exhibits robustness in low-resource settings. Moreover, it shows excellent training efficiency, achieving faster convergence than previous methods. This provides a new technical approach to WSD and may also apply to the task for other languages. Hansi Wang, Qiliang Liang |
COLING | 1 |
| 2025 | How Sememic Components Can Benefit Link Prediction for Lexico-Semantic Knowledge Graphs?abstractLink Prediction (LP) aims to predict missing triple information within a Knowledge Graph (KG).Existing LP methods have sought to improve the performance by integrating structural and textual information.However, for lexico-semantic KGs designed to document fine-grained sense distinctions, these types of information may not be sufficient to support effective LP.From a linguistic perspective, word senses within lexico-semantic relations usually show systematic differences in their sememic components.In light of this, we are motivated to enhance LP with sememe knowledge.We first construct a Sememe Prediction (SP) dataset, SememeDef, for learning such knowledge, and two Chinese datasets, HN7 and CWN5, for LP evaluation; Then, we propose a method, SememeLP, to leverage this knowledge for LP fully.It consistently and significantly improves the LP performance in both English and Chinese, achieving SOTA MRR of 75.1%, 80.5%, and 77.1% on WN18RR, HN7, and CWN5, respectively; Finally, an in-depth analysis is conducted, making clear how sememic components can benefit LP for lexico-semantic KGs, which provides promising progress for the completion of them 1 . Hansi Wang, Qiliang Liang, Yang Liu 0124 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2024 | Disambiguate Words like Composing Them: A Morphology-Informed Approach to Enhance Chinese Word Sense DisambiguationabstractIn parataxis languages like Chinese, word meanings are highly correlated with morphological knowledge, which can help to disambiguate word senses.However, in-depth exploration of morphological knowledge in previous word sense disambiguation (WSD) methods is still lacking due to the absence of publicly available resources.In this paper, we are motivated to enhance Chinese WSD with full morphological knowledge, including both word-formations and morphemes.We first construct the largest releasable Chinese WSD resources, including the lexico-semantic inventories MorInv and WrdInv, a Chinese WSD dataset MiCLS, and an out-of-volcabulary (OOV) test set.Then, we propose a model, MorBERT, to fully leverage this morphology-informed knowledge for Chinese WSD and achieve a SOTA F1 of 92.18% on MiCLS dataset.Finally, we demonstrated the model's robustness in low-resource settings and generalizability to OOV senses.These resources and methods may bring new insights into and solutions for various downstream tasks in both computational and humanistic fields 1 . Qiliang Liang, Yaqi Yin, Hansi Wang, Yang Liu 0124 |
ACL (1) | 4 |
| 2024 | Morpheme Sense Disambiguation: A New Task Aiming for Understanding the Language at Character LevelabstractMorphemes serve as a strong linguistic feature to capture lexical semantics, with higher coverage than words and more natural than sememes. However, due to the lack of morpheme-informed resources and the expense of manual annotation, morpheme-enhanced methods remain largely unexplored in Computational Linguistics. To address this issue, we propose the task of Morpheme Sense Disambiguation (MSD), with two subtasks in-text and in-word, similar to Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) and Sememe Prediction (SP), to generalize morpheme features on more tasks. We first build the MorDis resource for Chinese, including MorInv as a morpheme inventory, MorTxt and MorWrd as two types of morpheme-annotated datasets. Next, we provide two baselines in each evaluation; the best model yields a promising precision of 77.66% on in-text MSD and 88.19% on in-word MSD, indicating its comparability with WSD and superiority over SP. Finally, we demonstrate that predicted morphemes achieve comparable performance with the ground-truth ones on a downstream application of Definition Generation (DG). This validates the feasibility and applicability of our proposed tasks. The resources and workflow of MSD will provide new insights and solutions for downstream tasks, including DG as well as WSD, training pre-trained models, etc. Yaqi Yin, Hansi Wang, Qiliang Liang |
LREC/COLING | 4 |