Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Swayam Agrawal

dblp:376/1183 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching › region matching
segment matching
0.912025
SegMASt3R: Geometry Grounded Segment Matching · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching › line matching
wide-baseline line matching
0.912025
SegMASt3R: Geometry Grounded Segment Matching · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

segment matching · 0.93d foundation model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SegMASt3R: Geometry Grounded Segment Matching
abstract
Segment matching is an important intermediate task in computer vision that establishes correspondences between semantically or geometrically coherent regions across images. Unlike keypoint matching, which focuses on localized features, segment matching captures structured regions, offering greater robustness to occlusions, lighting variations, and viewpoint changes. In this paper, we leverage the spatial understanding of 3D foundation models to tackle wide-baseline segment matching, a challenging setting involving extreme viewpoint shifts. We propose an architecture that uses the inductive bias of these 3D foundation models to match segments across image pairs with up to $180^\circ$ rotation. Extensive experiments show that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods, including the SAM2 video propagator and local feature matching methods, by up to 30\% on the AUPRC metric, on ScanNet++ and Replica datasets. We further demonstrate benefits of the proposed model on relevant downstream tasks, including 3D instance mapping and object-relative navigation.
Rohit Jayanti, Swayam Agrawal, Vansh Garg, Siddharth Tourani, Muhammad Haris Khan, Sourav Garg, K. Madhava Krishna
NeurIPS2