Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tianjiao Cao

dblp:376/5486 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-9257-7490ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 77% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
scene text detection
0.912025
The Devil is in Fine-tuning and Long-tailed Problems: A New Benchmark for Scene Text Detection · IJCAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised learning · 0.9joint-dataset learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Towards Breaking the Visual Perception Bottleneck for Geometry Problem Solving
Tianjiao Cao, Jiahao Lyu 0002, Dongbao Yang, Weimin Mu, Yu Zhou 0015
ICDAR (2)1
2025 The Devil is in Fine-tuning and Long-tailed Problems: A New Benchmark for Scene Text Detection
abstract
Scene text detection has seen the emergence of high-performing methods that excel on academic benchmarks. However, these detectors often fail to replicate such success in real-world scenarios. We uncover two key factors contributing to this discrepancy through extensive experiments. First, a Fine-tuning Gap, where models leverage Dataset-Specific Optimization (DSO) paradigm for one domain at the cost of reduced effectiveness in others, leads to inflated performances on academic benchmarks. Second, the suboptimal performance in practical settings is primarily attributed to the longtailed distribution of texts, where detectors struggle with rare and complex categories as artistic or overlapped text. Given that the DSO paradigm might undermine the generalization ability of models, we advocate for a Joint-Dataset Learning (JDL) protocol to alleviate the Fine-tuning Gap. Additionally, an error analysis is conducted to identify three major categories and 13 subcategories of challenges in long-tailed scene text, upon which we propose a Long-Tailed Benchmark (LTB). LTB facilitates a comprehensive evaluation of ability to handle a diverse range of long-tailed challenges. We further introduce MAEDet, a self-supervised learningbased method, as a strong baseline for LTB. The code is available at https://github.com/pd162/LTB.
Tianjiao Cao, Jiahao Lyu 0002, Weichao Zeng, Weimin Mu, Yu Zhou 0015
IJCAI1