Benchmarks are essential for quantitatively tracking progress in AI. As AI agents become increasingly capable, researchers and practitioners have introduced agentic benchmarks to evaluate agents on complex, real-world tasks. These benchmarks typically measure agent capabilities by evaluating task outcomes via specific reward designs. However, we show that many agentic benchmarks have issues in task setup or reward design. For example, SWE-bench-Verified uses insufficient test cases, while $\tau$-bench counts empty responses as successes. Such issues can lead to under- or overestimation of agents’ performance by up to 100% in relative terms. To make agentic evaluation rigorous, we introduce the Agentic Benchmark Checklist (ABC), a set of guidelines that we synthesized from our benchmark-building experience, a survey of best practices, and previously reported issues. When applied to CVE-Bench, a benchmark with a particularly complex evaluation design, ABC reduces performance overestimation by 33%.

After decades of research in approximate query processing (AQP), its adoption in the industry remains limited. Existing methods struggle to simultaneously provide user-specified error guarantees, eliminate maintenance overheads, and avoid modifications to database management systems. To address these challenges, we introduce two novel techniques, TAQA and BSAP. TAQA is a two-stage online AQP algorithm that achieves all three properties for arbitrary queries. However, it can be slower than exact queries if we use standard row-level sampling. BSAP resolves this by enabling block-level sampling with statistical guarantees in TAQA. We implement TAQA and BSAP in a prototype middleware system, PilotDB, that is compatible with all DBMSs supporting efficient block-level sampling. We evaluate PilotDB on PostgreSQL, SQL Server, and DuckDB over real-world benchmarks, demonstrating up to 126X speedups when running with a 5% guaranteed error.