Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sofia Potapova

dblp:376/7604 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-2701-700XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 91% Vision and language · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
input perturbation
0.812024
Analyzing the Robustness of Vision & Language Models · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.812024
Analyzing the Robustness of Vision & Language Models · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › multimodal robustness
vision-language model robustness
0.812024
Analyzing the Robustness of Vision & Language Models · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering
0.212024
Analyzing the Robustness of Vision & Language Models · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 0.8text perturbation · 0.8image perturbation · 0.8attention analysis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Analyzing the Robustness of Vision & Language Models
abstract
We present an approach to evaluate the robustness of pre-trained vision and language (V&L) models to noise in input data. Given a source image/text, we perturb it using standard computer vision (CV) / natural language processing (NLP) techniques and feed it to a V&L model. To track performance changes, we explore the problem of visual questions answering (VQA). Overall, we utilize 5 image and 9 text perturbation techniques and probe three Transformer-based V&L models followed by a broad analysis of their behavior and a detailed comparison. We discovered several key findings regarding the performance of the models in relation to the impact of various perturbations. These discrepancies in performance can be attributed to differences in their architectures and learning objectives. Last, but not least, we perform an empirical study to assess whether the attention mechanism of V&L Transformers learns to align modalities. We hypothesize, that attention weights for related objects and words, should be on average higher than for random object/word pairs. However, our study shows that, unlike is believed for machine translation models, V&L models do not learn alignment at all or exhibit less evidence to do so. This may support the intuition that V&L Transformers overfit to either of the modalities.
Alexander Shirnin, Nikita Andreev, Sofia Potapova, Ekaterina Artemova
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process.3