Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Elliot Gestrin
dblp:377/2127
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 67% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
plan generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Symmetry-Aware Transformer Training for Automated Planning · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
symmetry-aware learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Symmetry-Aware Transformer Training for Automated Planning · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
transformer training |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Symmetry-Aware Transformer Training for Automated Planning · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 1.0contrastive learning · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Symmetry-Aware Transformer Training for Automated PlanningabstractWhile transformers excel in many settings, their application in the field of automated planning is limited. Prior work like PlanGPT, a state-of-the-art decoder-only transformer, struggles with extrapolation from easy to hard planning problems. This in turn stems from problem symmetries: planning tasks can be represented with arbitrary variable names that carry no meaning beyond being identifiers. This causes a combinatorial explosion of equivalent representations that pure transformers cannot efficiently learn from. We propose a novel contrastive learning objective to make transformers symmetry-aware and thereby compensate for their lack of inductive bias. Combining this with architectural improvements, we show that transformers can be efficiently trained for either plan-generation or heuristic-prediction. Our results across multiple planning domains demonstrate that our symmetry-aware training effectively and efficiently addresses the limitations of PlanGPT. Markus Fritzsche, Elliot Gestrin, Jendrik Seipp |
AAAI | 2 |