Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elliot Gestrin

dblp:377/2127 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 67% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
plan generation
1.012026
Symmetry-Aware Transformer Training for Automated Planning · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
symmetry-aware learning
1.012026
Symmetry-Aware Transformer Training for Automated Planning · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
transformer training
1.012026
Symmetry-Aware Transformer Training for Automated Planning · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 1.0contrastive learning · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Symmetry-Aware Transformer Training for Automated Planning
abstract
While transformers excel in many settings, their application in the field of automated planning is limited. Prior work like PlanGPT, a state-of-the-art decoder-only transformer, struggles with extrapolation from easy to hard planning problems. This in turn stems from problem symmetries: planning tasks can be represented with arbitrary variable names that carry no meaning beyond being identifiers. This causes a combinatorial explosion of equivalent representations that pure transformers cannot efficiently learn from. We propose a novel contrastive learning objective to make transformers symmetry-aware and thereby compensate for their lack of inductive bias. Combining this with architectural improvements, we show that transformers can be efficiently trained for either plan-generation or heuristic-prediction. Our results across multiple planning domains demonstrate that our symmetry-aware training effectively and efficiently addresses the limitations of PlanGPT.
Markus Fritzsche, Elliot Gestrin, Jendrik Seipp
AAAI2