Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexander Gietelink Oldenziel
dblp:378/1148
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
belief representation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Transformers Represent Belief State Geometry in their Residual Stream · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI › interpretable deep learning
residual stream analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Transformers Represent Belief State Geometry in their Residual Stream · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › neural network interpretation
transformer interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Transformers Represent Belief State Geometry in their Residual Stream · NeurIPS 2024 |
Information theory › algorithmic information theory
optimal predictor |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Transformers Represent Belief State Geometry in their Residual Stream · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
next-token prediction · 1.5linear representation analysis · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Transformers Represent Belief State Geometry in their Residual StreamabstractWhat computational structure are we building into large language models when we train them on next-token prediction? Here, we present evidence that this structure is given by the meta-dynamics of belief updating over hidden states of the data- generating process. Leveraging the theory of optimal prediction, we anticipate and then find that belief states are linearly represented in the residual stream of transformers, even in cases where the predicted belief state geometry has highly nontrivial fractal structure. We investigate cases where the belief state geometry is represented in the final residual stream or distributed across the residual streams of multiple layers, providing a framework to explain these observations. Furthermore we demonstrate that the inferred belief states contain information about the entire future, beyond the local next-token prediction that the transformers are explicitly trained on. Our work provides a general framework connecting the structure of training data to the geometric structure of activations inside transformers. Adam S. Shai, Lucas Teixeira, Alexander Gietelink Oldenziel, Sarah Marzen, Paul M. Riechers |
NeurIPS | 3 |