Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aleksandr Algasov

dblp:378/1430 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-3222-1604ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Face, body and person analysis · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Environmental and earth informatics · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › re-identification
animal re-identification
1.012026
On Combining Animal Re-Identification Models to Address Small Datasets · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2026
Environmental and earth informatics › biodiversity monitoring
wildlife monitoring
0.312026
On Combining Animal Re-Identification Models to Address Small Datasets · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model combination · 2.0local features · 2.0end-to-end learning · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 On Combining Animal Re-Identification Models to Address Small Datasets
abstract
Abstract Recent advancements in the automatic re-identification of animal individuals from images have opened up new possibilities for studying wildlife through camera traps and citizen science projects. Existing methods leverage distinct and permanent visual body markings, such as fur patterns or scars, and typically employ one of two approaches: local features or end-to-end learning. The end-to-end learning-based methods outperform local feature-based methods given a sufficient amount of good-quality training data, but the challenge of gathering such datasets for wildlife animals means that local feature-based methods remain a more practical approach for many species. In this study, we aim to achieve two goals: (1) to obtain a better understanding of the impact of training-set size on animal re-identification, and (2) to explore ways to combine various methods to leverage the advantages of their approaches for re-identification. In the work, we conduct comprehensive experiments across six different methods and six animal species with various training set sizes. Furthermore, we propose a simple yet effective combination strategy and show that a properly selected method combinations outperform the individual methods with both small and large training sets up to 30%. Additionally, the proposed combination strategy offers a generalizable framework to improve accuracy across species and address the challenges posed by small datasets, which are common in ecological research. This work lays the foundation for more robust and accessible tools to support wildlife conservation, population monitoring, and behavioral studies.
Aleksandr Algasov, Ekaterina A. Nepovinnykh, Fedor Zolotarev, Tuomas Eerola, Heikki Kälviäinen, Charles V. Stewart, Lasha Otarashvili, Jason Holmberg
Int. J. Comput. Vis.1