Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Haoyang Shang

dblp:378/2281 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 33% Multi-agent systems · 33% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › cognitive modeling
cognitive bias modeling
0.912025
Exploring Prosocial Irrationality for LLM Agents: A Social Cognition View · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents
0.912025
Exploring Prosocial Irrationality for LLM Agents: A Social Cognition View · ICLR 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
social intelligence
0.912025
Exploring Prosocial Irrationality for LLM Agents: A Social Cognition View · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-agent framework · 0.9hallucination · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Exploring Prosocial Irrationality for LLM Agents: A Social Cognition View
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to face hallucination issues due to the data they trained on often containing human bias; whether this is reflected in the decision-making process of LLM agents remains under-explored. As LLM Agents are increasingly employed in intricate social environments, a pressing and natural question emerges: Can we utilize LLM Agents' systematic hallucinations to mirror human cognitive biases, thus exhibiting irrational social intelligence? In this paper, we probe the irrational behavior among contemporary LLM agents by melding practical social science experiments with theoretical insights. Specifically, we propose CogMir, an open-ended Multi-LLM Agents framework that utilizes hallucination properties to assess and enhance LLM Agents’ social intelligence through cognitive biases. Experimental results on CogMir subsets show that LLM Agents and humans exhibit high consistency in irrational and prosocial decision-making under uncertain conditions, underscoring the prosociality of LLM Agents as social entities and highlighting the significance of hallucination properties. Additionally, CogMir framework demonstrates its potential as a valuable platform for encouraging more research into the social intelligence of LLM Agents.
Xuan Liu 0001, Jie Zhang 0076, Haoyang Shang, Song Guo 0001, Chengxu Yang, Quanyan Zhu
ICLR3