Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Haoyang Shang
dblp:378/2281
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 33% Multi-agent systems · 33% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › cognitive modeling
cognitive bias modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exploring Prosocial Irrationality for LLM Agents: A Social Cognition View · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exploring Prosocial Irrationality for LLM Agents: A Social Cognition View · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
social intelligence |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exploring Prosocial Irrationality for LLM Agents: A Social Cognition View · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-agent framework · 0.9hallucination · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Exploring Prosocial Irrationality for LLM Agents: A Social Cognition ViewabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have been shown to face hallucination issues due to the data they trained on often containing human bias; whether this is reflected in the decision-making process of LLM agents remains under-explored. As LLM Agents are increasingly employed in intricate social environments, a pressing and natural question emerges: Can we utilize LLM Agents' systematic hallucinations to mirror human cognitive biases, thus exhibiting irrational social intelligence? In this paper, we probe the irrational behavior among contemporary LLM agents by melding practical social science experiments with theoretical insights. Specifically, we propose CogMir, an open-ended Multi-LLM Agents framework that utilizes hallucination properties to assess and enhance LLM Agents’ social intelligence through cognitive biases. Experimental results on CogMir subsets show that LLM Agents and humans exhibit high consistency in irrational and prosocial decision-making under uncertain conditions, underscoring the prosociality of LLM Agents as social entities and highlighting the significance of hallucination properties. Additionally, CogMir framework demonstrates its potential as a valuable platform for encouraging more research into the social intelligence of LLM Agents. Xuan Liu 0001, Jie Zhang 0076, Haoyang Shang, Song Guo 0001, Chengxu Yang, Quanyan Zhu |
ICLR | 3 |