Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nikhil Shagrithaya

dblp:379/6280 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-7242-6416ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3 · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Coding theory · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
list decoding
1.922026
Probabilistic Guarantees to Explicit Constructions: Local Properties of Linear Codes · STOC 2026
Random Reed-Solomon Codes and Random Linear Codes are Locally Equivalent · FOCS 2025
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
list recovery
1.922026
Probabilistic Guarantees to Explicit Constructions: Local Properties of Linear Codes · STOC 2026
Random Reed-Solomon Codes and Random Linear Codes are Locally Equivalent · FOCS 2025
Coding theory
error-correcting codes
1.012026
Probabilistic Guarantees to Explicit Constructions: Local Properties of Linear Codes · STOC 2026
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes
linear code
1.012026
Probabilistic Guarantees to Explicit Constructions: Local Properties of Linear Codes · STOC 2026
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes › linear code
random linear codes
0.912025
Random Reed-Solomon Codes and Random Linear Codes are Locally Equivalent · FOCS 2025
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › error probability analysis
threshold rate
0.912025
Random Reed-Solomon Codes and Random Linear Codes are Locally Equivalent · FOCS 2025
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › list decoding
generalized singleton bound
0.312025
Random Reed-Solomon Codes and Random Linear Codes are Locally Equivalent · FOCS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

derandomization · 1.0AEL construction · 1.0threshold theorem · 0.9monotone-decreasing local coordinate-wise linear properties · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Probabilistic Guarantees to Explicit Constructions: Local Properties of Linear Codes
abstract
We present a general framework for derandomizing random linear codes with respect to a broad class of properties, known as local properties, which encompass several standard notions such as distance, list-decoding, list-recovery, and perfect hashing. Our approach extends the classical Alon–Edmonds–Luby (AEL) construction through a modified formalism of local coordinate-wise linear (LCL) properties, introduced by Levi, Mosheiff, and Shagrithaya (2025). The main theorem demonstrates that if random linear codes satisfy the complement of an LCL property P with high probability, then one can construct explicit codes satisfying the complement of P as well, with an enlarged yet constant alphabet size. This gives the first explicit constructions for list recovery, as well as special cases (e.g., list recovery with erasures, zero-error list recovery, perfect hash matrices), with parameters matching those of random linear codes. More broadly, our constructions realize the full range of parameters associated with these properties at the same level of optimality as in the random setting, thereby offering a systematic pathway from probabilistic guarantees to explicit codes that attain them. Furthermore, our derandomization of random linear codes also admits efficient (list) decoding via recently developed expander-based decoders.
Fernando Granha Jeronimo, Nikhil Shagrithaya
STOC2
2025 Near-Optimal List-Recovery of Linear Code Families
abstract
We prove several results on linear codes achieving list-recovery capacity. We show that random linear codes achieve list-recovery capacity with constant output list size (independent of the alphabet size and length). That is, over alphabets of size at least 𝓁^Ω(1/ε), random linear codes of rate R are (1-R-ε, 𝓁, (𝓁/ε)^O(𝓁/ε))-list-recoverable for all R ∈ (0,1) and 𝓁. Together with a result of Levi, Mosheiff, and Shagrithaya, this implies that randomly punctured Reed-Solomon codes also achieve list-recovery capacity. We also prove that our output list size is near-optimal among all linear codes: all (1-R-ε, 𝓁, L)-list-recoverable linear codes must have L ≥ 𝓁^{Ω(R/ε)}. Our simple upper bound combines the Zyablov-Pinsker argument with recent bounds from Kopparty, Ron-Zewi, Saraf, Wootters, and Tamo on the maximum intersection of a "list-recovery ball" and a low-dimensional subspace with large distance. Our lower bound is inspired by a recent lower bound of Chen and Zhang.
Ray Li, Nikhil Shagrithaya
APPROX/RANDOM2
2025 Random Reed-Solomon Codes and Random Linear Codes are Locally Equivalent
abstract
We establish an equivalence between two important random ensembles of linear codes: random linear codes (RLCs) and random Reed-Solomon (RS) codes. Specifically, we show that these models exhibit identical behavior with respect to key combinatorial properties—such as list-decodability and list-recoverability—when the alphabet size is sufficiently large. We introduce monotone-decreasing local coordinate-wise linear (LCL) properties, a new class of properties tailored for the large alphabet regime. This class encompasses listdecodability, list-recoverability, and their average-weight variants. We develop a framework for analyzing these properties and prove a threshold theorem for RLCs: for any LCL property $\mathcal{P}$, there exists a threshold rate $R_{\mathcal{P}}$ such that RLCs are likely to satisfy $\mathcal{P}$ when R<$R_{\mathcal{P}}$ and unlikely to do so when $R\gt R_{\mathcal{P}}$. We extend this threshold theorem to random RS codes and show that they share the same threshold $R_{\mathcal{P}}$, thereby establishing the equivalence between the two ensembles and enabling a unified analysis of list-recoverability and related properties. Applying our framework, we compute the threshold rate for list-decodability, proving that both random RS codes and RLCs achieve the generalized Singleton bound. This recovers a recent result of Alrabiah, Guruswami, and Li (2023) via elementary methods. Additionally, we prove an upper bound on the list-recoverability threshold and conjecture that this bound is tight. Our approach suggests a plausible pathway for proving this conjecture and thereby pinpointing the list-recoverability parameters of both models. Indeed, following the release of a prior version of this paper, Li and Shagrithaya (2025) used our equivalence theorem to show that random RS codes are near-optimally list-recoverable.
Matan Levi, Jonathan Mosheiff, Nikhil Shagrithaya
FOCS3
2025 Reductions Between Code Equivalence Problems
abstract
In this paper, we present two reductions between variants of the Code Equivalence problem. We give polynomialtime Karp reductions from Permutation Code Equivalence (PCE) to both Linear Code Equivalence (LCE) and Signed Permutation Code Equivalence (SPCE). Along with a Karp reduction from SPCE to the Lattice Isomorphism Problem (LIP) shown by Bennett and Win (2024), our second result implies a reduction from PCE to LIP.
Mahdi Cheraghchi, Nikhil Shagrithaya, Alexandra Veliche Hostetler
ISIT2