Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yu Su 0013
dblp:38/1070-13
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-7159-4542ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Usable security · 50% Privacy and data protection · 50% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
information leakage |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Privacy Paradox and Optimal Bias-Variance Trade-offs in Data Acquisition · EC 2021 |
Usable security › usable privacy › privacy behavior
privacy paradox |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Privacy Paradox and Optimal Bias-Variance Trade-offs in Data Acquisition · EC 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mechanism design · 1.0bias-variance trade-off · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | The Privacy Paradox and Optimal Bias-Variance Trade-offs in Data AcquisitionabstractWhile users claim to be concerned about privacy, often they do little to protect their privacy in their online actions. One prominent explanation for this "privacy paradox'' is that when an individual shares her data, it is not just her privacy that is compromised; the privacy of other individuals with correlated data is also compromised. This information leakage encourages oversharing of data and significantly impacts the incentives of individuals in online platforms. In this paper, we study the design of mechanisms for data acquisition in settings with information leakage and verifiable data. We design an incentive compatible mechanism that optimizes the worst-case trade-off between bias and variance of the estimation subject to a budget constraint, where the worst-case is over the unknown correlation between costs and data. Additionally, we characterize the structure of the optimal mechanism in closed form and study monotonicity and non-monotonicity properties of the marketplace. Guocheng Liao, Yu Su 0013, Juba Ziani, Adam Wierman, Jianwei Huang 0001 |
EC | 2 |