Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Russell A. Manning

dblp:38/3706 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
4 papers
Computational photography and imaging · 70% Rendering · 12% Computer animation and physical simulation · 12%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational photography and imaging
camera calibration
0.122002
Stratified Self Calibration from Screw-Transform Manifolds · ECCV (4) 2002
Affine Calibration from Moving Objects · ICCV 2001
Computational photography and imaging › camera calibration
self-calibration
0.012002
Stratified Self Calibration from Screw-Transform Manifolds · ECCV (4) 2002
Computational photography and imaging › camera calibration
camera self-calibration
0.012001
Metric Self Calibration from Screw-Transform Manifolds · CVPR (1) 2001
Computer animation and physical simulation › animation generation
dynamic scene interpolation
0.011999
Interpolating View and Scene Motion by Dynamic View Morphing · CVPR 1999
Rendering › image-based rendering
view interpolation
0.011999
Interpolating View and Scene Motion by Dynamic View Morphing · CVPR 1999
Image and video processing
motion analysis
0.012001
Affine Calibration from Moving Objects · ICCV 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

screw-transform decomposition · 0.1modulus constraint · 0.1kruppa constraints · 0.1stratification · 0.0screw-transform manifolds · 0.0view morphing · 0.0point correspondence · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Stratified Self Calibration from Screw-Transform Manifolds
Russell A. Manning, Charles R. Dyer
ECCV (4)1
2001 Metric Self Calibration from Screw-Transform Manifolds
abstract
This paper introduces a method for metric self-calibration that is based on a novel decomposition of the fundamental matrix between two views taken by a camera with fixed internal parameters. The method blends important advantages of the Kruppa constraints and the modulus constraint: it works directly from fundamental matrices and uses a reduced-parameter representation for stability. General properties of the new decomposition are also developed, including an intuitive interpretation of the three free parameters of internal calibration. The approach is demonstrated on both real and synthetic data.
Russell A. Manning, Charles R. Dyer
CVPR (1)1
2001 Affine Calibration from Moving Objects
Russell A. Manning, Charles R. Dyer
ICCV1
1999 Interpolating View and Scene Motion by Dynamic View Morphing
abstract
We introduce the problem of view interpolation for dynamic scenes. Our solution to this problem extends the concept of view morphing and retains the practical advantages of that method. We are specifically concerned with interpolating between two reference views captured at different times, so that there is a missing interval of time between when the views were taken. The synthetic interpolations produced by our algorithm portray one possible physically-valid version of what transpired in the scene during the missing time. It is assumed that each object in the original scene underwent a series of rigid translations. Dynamic view morphing can work with widely-spaced reference views, sparse point correspondences, and uncalibrated cameras. When the camera-to-camera transformation can be determined, the synthetic interpolation will portray scene objects moving along straight-line, constant-velocity trajectories in world space.
Russell A. Manning, Charles R. Dyer
CVPR1