Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ying Ding 0005

dblp:38/6013-5 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0003-2567-2009ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 44% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 44% Representation and self-supervised learning · 13%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 50% Software maintenance and evolution · 50%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-domain learning
0.312017
Recurrent Neural Networks with Auxiliary Labels for Cross-Domain Opinion Target Extraction · AAAI 2017
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis
opinion target extraction
0.312017
Recurrent Neural Networks with Auxiliary Labels for Cross-Domain Opinion Target Extraction · AAAI 2017
Software maintenance and evolution
bug triage
0.312017
Improving Automated Bug Triaging with Specialized Topic Model · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2017
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.312017
Improving Automated Bug Triaging with Specialized Topic Model · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2017
Computational social science and digital humanities
social media analysis
0.212014
Lifetime Lexical Variation in Social Media · AAAI 2014
Data mining › text mining
topic modeling
0.212014
Lifetime Lexical Variation in Social Media · AAAI 2014
Data mining › text mining
text classification
0.112017
Improving Automated Bug Triaging with Specialized Topic Model · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-feature topic model · 0.6latent dirichlet allocation · 0.6incremental learning · 0.6latent variable model · 0.4rule-based labeling · 0.3recurrent neural network · 0.3auxiliary labels · 0.3Gibbs-EM · 0.2Gibbs EM · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Recurrent Neural Networks with Auxiliary Labels for Cross-Domain Opinion Target Extraction
abstract
Opinion target extraction is a fundamental task in opinion mining. In recent years, neural network based supervised learning methods have achieved competitive performance on this task. However, as with any supervised learning method, neural network based methods for this task cannot work well when the training data comes from a different domain than the test data. On the other hand, some rule-based unsupervised methods have shown to be robust when applied to different domains. In this work, we use rule-based unsupervised methods to create auxiliary labels and use neural network models to learn a hidden representation that works well for different domains. When this hidden representation is used for opinion target extraction, we find that it can outperform a number of strong baselines with a large margin.
Ying Ding 0005, Jianfei Yu, Jing Jiang 0001
AAAI1
2017 A Neural Network Model for Semi-supervised Review Aspect Identification
Ying Ding 0005, Changlong Yu, Jing Jiang 0001
PAKDD (2)1
2017 Improving Automated Bug Triaging with Specialized Topic Model
abstract
Bug triaging refers to the process of assigning a bug to the most appropriate developer to fix. It becomes more and more difficult and complicated as the size of software and the number of developers increase. In this paper, we propose a new framework for bug triaging, which maps the words in the bug reports (i.e., the term space) to their corresponding topics (i.e., the topic space). We propose a specialized topic modeling algorithm namedmulti-feature topic model (MTM)which extends Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) for bug triaging.MTMconsiders product and component information of bug reports to map the term space to the topic space. Finally, we propose an incremental learning method namedTopicMinerwhich considers the topic distribution of a new bug report to assign an appropriate fixer based on the affinity of the fixer to the topics. We pairTopicMinerwith MTM (TopicMiner$^{MTM}$). We have evaluated our solution on 5 large bug report datasets including GCC, OpenOffice, Mozilla, Netbeans, and Eclipse containing a total of 227,278 bug reports. We show thatTopicMiner$^{MTM}$can achieve top-1 and top-5 prediction accuracies of 0.4831-0.6868, and 0.7686-0.9084, respectively. We also compareTopicMiner$^{MTM}$with Bugzie, LDA-KL, SVM-LDA, LDA-Activity, and Yang et al.'s approach. The results show thatTopicMiner$^{MTM}$on average improves top-1 and top-5 prediction accuracies of Bugzie by 128.48 and 53.22 percent, LDA-KL by 262.91 and 105.97 percent, SVM-LDA by 205.89 and 110.48 percent, LDA-Activity by 377.60 and 176.32 percent, and Yang et al.'s approach by 59.88 and 13.70 percent, respectively.
Xin Xia 0001, David Lo 0001, Ying Ding 0005, Jafar M. Al-Kofahi, Tien N. Nguyen, Xinyu Wang 0001
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.3
2014 Lifetime Lexical Variation in Social Media
abstract
As the rapid growth of online social media attracts a large number of Internet users, the large volume of content generated by these users also provides us with an opportunity to study the lexical variation of people of different ages. In this paper, we present a latent variable model that jointly models the lexical content of tweets and Twitter users’ ages. Our model inherently assumes that a topic has not only a word distribution but also an age distribution. We propose a Gibbs-EM algorithm to perform inference on our model. Empirical evaluation shows that our model can learn meaningful age-specific topics such as “school” for teenagers and “health” for older people. Our model can also be used for age prediction and performs better than a number of baseline methods.
Lizi Liao, Jing Jiang 0001, Ying Ding 0005, Heyan Huang, Ee-Peng Lim
AAAI3