Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael I. Parzen

dblp:38/6681 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge-based systems
0.021997
QUEM: An Achievement Test for Knowledge-Based Systems · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1997
An Achievement Test for Knowledge-Based Systems: QUEM · IJCAI (1) 1997
Empirical software engineering
software metrics
0.011997
QUEM: An Achievement Test for Knowledge-Based Systems · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

skill function · 0.0confidence bands · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 An Achievement Test for Knowledge-Based Systems: QUEM
Caroline C. Hayes, Michael I. Parzen
IJCAI (1)2
1997 QUEM: An Achievement Test for Knowledge-Based Systems
abstract
This paper describes the Quality and Experience Metric (QUEM), a method for estimating the skill level of a knowledge based system based on the quality of the solutions it produces. It allows one to assess how many years of experience the system would be judged to have if it were a human by providing a quantitative measure of the system's overall competence. QUEM can be viewed as a type of achievement or job placement test administered to knowledge based systems to help system designers determine how the system should be used and by what level of user. To apply QUEM, a set of subjects, experienced judges, and problems must be identified. The subjects should have a broad range of experience levels. Subjects and the knowledge based system are asked to solve the problems; and judges are asked to rank order all solutions, from worst quality to best. The data from the subjects is used to construct a skill function relating experience to solution quality, and confidence bands showing the variability in performance. The system's quality ranking is then plugged into the skill function to produce an estimate of the system's experience level. QUEM can be used to gauge the experience level of an individual system, to compare two systems, or to compare a system to its intended users. This represents an important advance in providing quantitative measures of overall performance that can be applied to a broad range of systems.
Caroline C. Hayes, Michael I. Parzen
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.2