Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thomas B. Sebastian

dblp:38/857 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
9as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 6 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 first-authorTheory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers
Geometric modeling and processing · 57% Image and video processing · 43%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
3D vision · 43% Face, body and person analysis · 38% Image recognition and object detection · 19%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Computational geometry · 38% Algorithms and data structures · 38% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 23%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing
shape correspondence
0.122004
Recognition of Shapes by Editing Their Shock Graphs · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2004
On Aligning Curves · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003
Geometric modeling and processing › shape analysis
shape recognition
0.122004
Recognition of Shapes by Editing Their Shock Graphs · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2004
On Aligning Curves · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
person re-identification
0.112006
Person Reidentification Using Spatiotemporal Appearance · CVPR (2) 2006
Image and video processing
image segmentation
0.112006
Person Reidentification Using Spatiotemporal Appearance · CVPR (2) 2006
Image and video processing › video segmentation
spatiotemporal segmentation
0.112006
Person Reidentification Using Spatiotemporal Appearance · CVPR (2) 2006
Geometric modeling and processing › shape matching
curve matching
0.012003
On Aligning Curves · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003
Image and video processing › document image analysis › character recognition
handwritten character recognition
0.012003
On Aligning Curves · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d shape analysis
0.012002
Shock-Based Indexing into Large Shape Databases · ECCV (3) 2002
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape analysis
shape indexing
0.012002
Shock-Based Indexing into Large Shape Databases · ECCV (3) 2002
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
shape recognition
0.012001
Recognition of Shapes by Editing Shock Graphs · ICCV 2001
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › string algorithms
edit distance
0.012001
Shape matching using edit-distance: an implementation · SODA 2001
Computational geometry
shape matching
0.012001
Shape matching using edit-distance: an implementation · SODA 2001
Information retrieval › image retrieval
shape retrieval
0.012002
Shock-Based Indexing into Large Shape Databases · ECCV (3) 2002
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory › graph similarity
graph edit distance
0.012001
Recognition of Shapes by Editing Shock Graphs · ICCV 2001
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph matching
0.012001
Recognition of Shapes by Editing Shock Graphs · ICCV 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

region growing · 0.1interest point operator · 0.1articulated model fitting · 0.1shock-based indexing · 0.1shock graph representation · 0.1graph editing · 0.1shock graph · 0.0graph topology · 0.0edit distance · 0.0dynamic programming · 0.0curvature-based similarity · 0.0alignment curve · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Person Reidentification Using Spatiotemporal Appearance
abstract
In many surveillance applications it is desirable to determine if a given individual has been previously observed over a network of cameras. This is the person reidentification problem. This paper focuses on reidentification algorithms that use the overall appearance of an individual as opposed to passive biometrics such as face and gait. Person reidentification approaches have two aspects: (i) establish correspondence between parts, and (ii) generate signatures that are invariant to variations in illumination, pose, and the dynamic appearance of clothing. A novel spatiotemporal segmentation algorithm is employed to generate salient edgels that are robust to changes in appearance of clothing. The invariant signatures are generated by combining normalized color and salient edgel histograms. Two approaches are proposed to generate correspondences: (i) a model based approach that fits an articulated model to each individual to establish a correspondence map, and (ii) an interest point operator approach that nominates a large number of potential correspondences which are evaluated using a region growing scheme. Finally, the approaches are evaluated on a 44 person database across 3 disparate views.
Niloofar Gheissari, Thomas B. Sebastian, Richard I. Hartley
CVPR (2)2
2006 Objective PET Lesion Segmentation Using a Spherical Mean Shift Algorithm
Thomas B. Sebastian, Ravindra M. Manjeshwar, Timothy J. Akhurst, James V. Miller
MICCAI (2)1
2005 Curves vs. skeletons in object recognition
Thomas B. Sebastian, Benjamin B. Kimia
Signal Process.1
2004 Recognition of Shapes by Editing Their Shock Graphs
abstract
This paper presents a novel framework for the recognition of objects based on their silhouettes. The main idea is to measure the distance between two shapes as the minimum extent of deformation necessary for one shape to match the other. Since the space of deformations is very high-dimensional, three steps are taken to make the search practical: 1) define an equivalence class for shapes based on shock-graph topology, 2) define an equivalence class for deformation paths based on shock-graph transitions, and 3) avoid complexity-increasing deformation paths by moving toward shock-graph degeneracy. Despite these steps, which tremendously reduce the search requirement, there still remain numerous deformation paths to consider. To that end, we employ an edit-distance algorithm for shock graphs that finds the optimal deformation path in polynomial time. The proposed approach gives intuitive correspondences for a variety of shapes and is robust in the presence of a wide range of visual transformations. The recognition rates on two distinct databases of 99 and 216 shapes each indicate highly successful within category matches (100 percent in top three matches), which render the framework potentially usable in a range of shape-based recognition applications.
Thomas B. Sebastian, Philip N. Klein, Benjamin B. Kimia
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
2003 Segmentation of carpal bones from CT images using skeletally coupled deformable models
Thomas B. Sebastian, Hüseyin Tek, Joseph J. Crisco, Benjamin B. Kimia
Medical Image Anal.1
2003 On Aligning Curves
abstract
We present a novel approach to finding a correspondence (alignment) between two curves. The correspondence is based on a notion of an alignment curve which treats both curves symmetrically. We then define a similarity metric based on the alignment curve using two intrinsic properties of the curve, namely, length and curvature. The optimal correspondence is found by an efficient dynamic-programming method both for aligning pairs of curve segments and pairs of closed curves, and is effective in the presence of a variety of transformations of the curve. Finally, the correspondence is shown in application to handwritten character recognition, prototype formation, and object recognition, and is potentially useful in other applications such as registration and tracking.
Thomas B. Sebastian, Philip N. Klein, Benjamin B. Kimia
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
2002 Shock-Based Indexing into Large Shape Databases
Thomas B. Sebastian, Philip N. Klein, Benjamin B. Kimia
ECCV (3)1
2001 Recognition of Shapes by Editing Shock Graphs
Thomas B. Sebastian, Philip N. Klein, Benjamin B. Kimia
ICCV1
2001 Curves vs skeletons in object recognition
abstract
The type of representation used in describing shape can have a significant impact on the effectiveness of a recognition strategy. Shape has been represented by its bounding curve as well as by the medial axis representation which captures the regional interaction of the boundaries. Shape matching with the former representation is achieved by curve matching, while the latter is achieved by matching skeletal graphs. We compare the effectiveness of these two methods using approaches which we have developed recently for each. The results indicate that skeletal matching involves a higher degree of computational complexity, but is better than curve matching in the presence of articulation or rearrangement of parts. However, when these variations are not present, curve matching is a better strategy due to its lower complexity and roughly equivalent recognition rate.
Thomas B. Sebastian, Benjamin B. Kimia
ICIP (3)1
2001 Shape matching using edit-distance: an implementation
Philip N. Klein, Thomas B. Sebastian, Benjamin B. Kimia
SODA2
1998 Segmentation of Carpal Bones from 3d CT Images Using Skeletally Coupled Deformable Models
Thomas B. Sebastian, Hüseyin Tek, Joseph J. Crisco, Scott W. Wolfe, Benjamin B. Kimia
MICCAI1