Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jianchang Su

dblp:381/3654 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-4089-8316ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Hardware security and side channels · 50% Systems and software security · 50%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security › trusted computing
integrity measurement
1.012026
TrustWeave: Integrity Measurement and Attestation For Multi-Cloud LLMs · EuroSys 2026
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments
1.012026
TrustWeave: Integrity Measurement and Attestation For Multi-Cloud LLMs · EuroSys 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents
0.312026
TrustWeave: Integrity Measurement and Attestation For Multi-Cloud LLMs · EuroSys 2026
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud deployment
multi-cloud deployment
0.312026
TrustWeave: Integrity Measurement and Attestation For Multi-Cloud LLMs · EuroSys 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

runtime measurement registers · 3.0Linux IMA · 3.0Intel TDX · 3.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 TrustWeave: Integrity Measurement and Attestation For Multi-Cloud LLMs
abstract
Multi-cloud deployed multi-agent systems powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) introduce critical security challenges. While Intel Trust Domain Extensions (TDX)-based Confidential Virtual Machines (CVMs) provide strong isolation and boot-time attestation, they lack dynamic runtime integrity verification, a capability essential for trusted agent systems that frequently load new models and coordinate across distributed services. We present TrustWeave, a runtime integrity measurement and attestation framework that extends the Linux Integrity Measurement Architecture (IMA) with support for Intel TDX's Runtime Measurement Registers (RTMRs). TrustWeave enables userspace attestation of dynamically loaded agent components throughout their life-cycle, providing runtime trust guarantees for secure and scalable LLM agent deployments.
Jianchang Su, Kexin Chu, Youyou Lu, Wei Zhang 0052
EuroSys1
2024 PISeL: Pipelining DNN Inference for Serverless Computing
abstract
Serverless computing offers resource efficiency, cost efficiency, and a "pay-as-you-go" pricing model, which makes it highly attractive to both users and cloud providers. However, serverless computing faces serious cold start problem, especially for deep neural network (DNN) inference, which requires low latency. Existing cold start optimization focuses only on quick container start and fast runtime and library loading. However, DNN application bootstrap (DNN framework load and start, model initialization, model download, deserialization and copy) is the leading factor during the overall cold start time. As the model size grows, the application-level bootstrap becomes more severe.
Masoud Rahimi Jafari, Jianchang Su, Oliver Wang, Wei Zhang 0052
CIKM2
2024 FastMatch: Enhancing Data Pipeline Efficiency for Accelerated Distributed Training
abstract
Training a deep learning model typically involves two interdependent stages: preprocessing input data on the CPU and training the model on the GPU. This process begins with the CPU performing resource-intensive I/O operations to load raw data, which it then processes and supplies to the GPU. This creates a typical provider-consumer relationship between the CPU and GPU. However, the inefficiency of I/O and CPU operations, in contrast to the high capabilities of GPUs, often turns preprocessing into a significant bottleneck. The imbalance between CPU and GPU resources leads to inefficiency, as the underutilized GPU cannot fully exploit its computational potential. To address this issue, we propose FastMatch, a system designed to selectively and precisely cache key data, thereby reducing the reliance on extensive I/O operations, and adjusting the CPU's performance to better align with the GPU's capabilities swiftly. FastMatch dynamically identifies important data and prompts the caching system to store it in fast DRAM. This cached data significantly enhances I/O performance while maintaining comparable accuracy levels. Additionally, FastMatch monitors and rectifies mismatches in CPU and GPU resources by tuning the number of preprocessing processes. This helps distribute preprocessing workloads more evenly, ensuring optimal utilization of both CPU and GPU resources. We implemented a prototype of FastMatch and successfully integrated it with TorchData. Our evaluations showed up to 2.2 × reduction in training time compared to vanilla PyTorch Dataloader.
Jianchang Su, Masoud Rahimi Jafari, Wei Zhang 0052
ICCD1