Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Samika Gupta

dblp:381/6113 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias mitigation
0.812024
Mitigating Subgroup Unfairness in Machine Learning Classifiers: A Data-Driven Approach · ICDE 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.812024
Mitigating Subgroup Unfairness in Machine Learning Classifiers: A Data-Driven Approach · ICDE 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › group fairness
subgroup fairness
0.812024
Mitigating Subgroup Unfairness in Machine Learning Classifiers: A Data-Driven Approach · ICDE 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

data preprocessing · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Mitigating Subgroup Unfairness in Machine Learning Classifiers: A Data-Driven Approach
abstract
Fairness in machine learning, particularly in classifiers, is receiving increasing attention. However, most studies on this topic focus on fairness metrics for a limited number of predefined groups and do not address fairness across intersectional subgroups. In this paper, we investigate ways to improve subgroup fairness where subgroups are defined by the intersection of protected attributes. Specifically, our paper reveals the correlation between the representation bias of training data and model fairness. We demonstrate that biased sample collection due to historical biases and a lack of control over data collection can lead to unfairness in learned models. We introduce the concept of an “Implicit Biased Set (IBS)”, which refers to regions in the intersectional attribute space where positive and negative examples are not proportionately represented. For example, if our training data set has a disproportionate representation of black male recidivists, then criminal risk assessment tools are more likely to discriminate against black males, even if they are innocent. We propose an efficient pre-processing approach that initially identifies IBS and then employs techniques to remedy the data collection within IBS. Our evaluation shows that our method effectively mitigates various subgroup biases regardless of the downstream machine learning models used.
Yin Lin, Samika Gupta, H. V. Jagadish
ICDE2