Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ole Nies
dblp:381/6154
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fair classification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FairCR - An Evaluation and Recommendation System for Fair Classification Algorithms · ICDE 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FairCR - An Evaluation and Recommendation System for Fair Classification Algorithms · ICDE 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fairness evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FairCR - An Evaluation and Recommendation System for Fair Classification Algorithms · ICDE 2024 |
Machine learning and data management › automated machine learning
algorithm selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | FairCR - An Evaluation and Recommendation System for Fair Classification Algorithms · ICDE 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
comparative evaluation · 1.5algorithm recommendation · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | FairCR - An Evaluation and Recommendation System for Fair Classification AlgorithmsabstractA persistent problem of machine learning (ML) predictions is potential discrimination towards individuals from specific population groups, e.g., based on gender, religion, etc. Numerous algorithms have been proposed to tackle biased predictions leading to such discrimination, particularly for classification problems. These algorithms typically aim to reduce bias as defined by specific metrics. Given the large variety of algorithms and metrics, selecting a method suited for a particular application is tedious and challenging. FairCR is an extensible system that allows the evaluation of fair classification algorithms in a systematic and unified way. It further recommends which fair classification algorithms to use based on several application preferences. We showcase FairCR's functionality on a large set of readily implemented algorithms and metrics over multiple datasets, demonstrating how it can support the comparative evaluation of algorithms and help select specific fair classification alaorithms for given application preferences. Nico Lässig, Melanie Herschel, Ole Nies |
ICDE | 3 |