Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ole Nies

dblp:381/6154 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fair classification
0.812024
FairCR - An Evaluation and Recommendation System for Fair Classification Algorithms · ICDE 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.812024
FairCR - An Evaluation and Recommendation System for Fair Classification Algorithms · ICDE 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fairness evaluation
0.812024
FairCR - An Evaluation and Recommendation System for Fair Classification Algorithms · ICDE 2024
Machine learning and data management › automated machine learning
algorithm selection
0.212024
FairCR - An Evaluation and Recommendation System for Fair Classification Algorithms · ICDE 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

comparative evaluation · 1.5algorithm recommendation · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 FairCR - An Evaluation and Recommendation System for Fair Classification Algorithms
abstract
A persistent problem of machine learning (ML) predictions is potential discrimination towards individuals from specific population groups, e.g., based on gender, religion, etc. Numerous algorithms have been proposed to tackle biased predictions leading to such discrimination, particularly for classification problems. These algorithms typically aim to reduce bias as defined by specific metrics. Given the large variety of algorithms and metrics, selecting a method suited for a particular application is tedious and challenging. FairCR is an extensible system that allows the evaluation of fair classification algorithms in a systematic and unified way. It further recommends which fair classification algorithms to use based on several application preferences. We showcase FairCR's functionality on a large set of readily implemented algorithms and metrics over multiple datasets, demonstrating how it can support the comparative evaluation of algorithms and help select specific fair classification alaorithms for given application preferences.
Nico Lässig, Melanie Herschel, Ole Nies
ICDE3