Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Francisco Andrade 0005

dblp:382/3776 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 75% Information theory · 25%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.812024
Sparsistency for inverse optimal transport · ICLR 2024
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
inverse optimal transport
0.812024
Sparsistency for inverse optimal transport · ICLR 2024
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport
0.812024
Sparsistency for inverse optimal transport · ICLR 2024
Mathematical optimization
regularization
0.812024
Sparsistency for inverse optimal transport · ICLR 2024
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
sparse recovery
0.812024
Sparsistency for inverse optimal transport · ICLR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

l1 regularization · 1.5entropic regularization · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Sparsistency for inverse optimal transport
abstract
Optimal Transport is a useful metric to compare probability distributions and to compute a pairing given a ground cost. Its entropic regularization variant (eOT) is crucial to have fast algorithms and reflect fuzzy/noisy matchings. This work focuses on Inverse Optimal Transport (iOT), the problem of inferring the ground cost from samples drawn from a coupling that solves an eOT problem. It is a relevant problem that can be used to infer unobserved/missing links, and to obtain meaningful information about the structure of the ground cost yielding the pairing. On one side, iOT benefits from convexity, but on the other side, being ill-posed, it requires regularization to handle the sampling noise. This work presents an in-depth theoretical study of the $\ell_1$ regularization to model for instance Euclidean costs with sparse interactions between features. Specifically, we derive a sufficient condition for the robust recovery of the sparsity of the ground cost that can be seen as a far reaching generalization of the Lasso’s celebrated ``Irrepresentability Condition’’. To provide additional insight into this condition (consequently on the types of recoverable costs) we work out in detail the Gaussian case. Surprisingly, varying the entropic regularizer provides evidence that the Gaussian iOT interpolates between a graphical Lasso and a classical Lasso, thereby establishing a connection between iOT and graph estimation, an important problem in ML.
Francisco Andrade 0005, Gabriel Peyré, Clarice Poon
ICLR1