Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ege Caglar

dblp:383/4565 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Legged, aerial and field robots · 56% Motion planning and robot control · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.812024
Toward Self-Righting and Recovery in the Wild: Challenges and Benchmarks · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › dynamic balance control
self-righting
0.812024
Toward Self-Righting and Recovery in the Wild: Challenges and Benchmarks · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
legged robot locomotion
0.212024
Toward Self-Righting and Recovery in the Wild: Challenges and Benchmarks · ICRA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

student-teacher learning · 0.8simulation-to-reality transfer · 0.8deep reinforcement learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Toward Self-Righting and Recovery in the Wild: Challenges and Benchmarks
abstract
Self-recovery is a critical capability for robust, agile robots operating in the real world. Given truly challenging terrain, it is nearly inevitable that, at some point, the robot will fail and subsequently need to recover if it is to continue its task. One critical subset of recovery is standing back up after falling down (aka "self-righting"), an essential early milestone for babies learning to walk, and an existential capability for animals. While some robots can be designed with multiple orientations for mobility, most seeking to affect the world would significantly benefit from planners/policies that facilitate self-righting whenever possible.In this work, we present a series of challenges that outline why recovery in the wild is difficult. We then present a set of benchmark policies trained in simulation using deep reinforcement learning (RL) and the Student-Teacher approach. Finally, we evaluate the performance of these policies on a set of benchmark contexts in simulation, and provide baseline validation on a physical robot.
Rosario Scalise, Ege Caglar, Byron Boots, Chad C. Kessens
ICRA2