Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Oscar Smee

dblp:384/4179 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization
0.812024
Inexact Newton-type Methods for Optimisation with Nonnegativity Constraints · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
newton-type methods
0.812024
Inexact Newton-type Methods for Optimisation with Nonnegativity Constraints · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
nonlinear optimization
0.812024
Inexact Newton-type Methods for Optimisation with Nonnegativity Constraints · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

two-metric projection · 0.8inexact newton method · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Inexact Newton-type Methods for Optimisation with Nonnegativity Constraints
abstract
We consider solving large scale nonconvex optimisation problems with nonnegativity constraints. Such problems arise frequently in machine learning, such as nonnegative least-squares, nonnegative matrix factorisation, as well as problems with sparsity-inducing regularisation. In such settings, first-order methods, despite their simplicity, can be prohibitively slow on ill-conditioned problems or become trapped near saddle regions, while most second-order alternatives involve non-trivially challenging subproblems. The two-metric projection framework, initially proposed by Bertsekas (1982), alleviates these issues and achieves the best of both worlds by combining projected gradient steps at the boundary of the feasible region with Newton steps in the interior in such a way that feasibility can be maintained by simple projection onto the nonnegative orthant. We develop extensions of the two-metric projection framework, which by inexactly solving the subproblems as well as employing non-positive curvature directions, are suitable for large scale and nonconvex settings. We obtain state-of-the-art convergence rates for various classes of non-convex problems and demonstrate competitive practical performance on a variety of problems.
Oscar Smee, Fred (Farbod) Roosta
ICML1