Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mio Kochiyama

dblp:384/7560 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network security
anonymity networks
0.912025
pPHI: Path Validation for a Lightweight Anonymity Protocol · ICNP 2025
Network security › routing security
path validation
0.912025
pPHI: Path Validation for a Lightweight Anonymity Protocol · ICNP 2025
Network security › anonymity networks
anonymous communication protocol
0.312025
pPHI: Path Validation for a Lightweight Anonymity Protocol · ICNP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

security analysis · 0.9protocol design · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 pPHI: Path Validation for a Lightweight Anonymity Protocol
abstract
Lightweight anonymity protocols provide a well-balanced anonymity and performance by encrypting and decrypting only packet headers under the active and local adversary threat model. Among them, PHI and dPHI are promising in universally providing relationship anonymity. However, when overlaid onto IP, they are susceptible to the router skipping attack, where honest routers are skipped by malicious routers. Although this attack poses a significant threat to anonymity, its prevention is challenging due to the lack of path integrity in these protocols. To address this limitation, this paper integrates path validation into dPHI. This integration is non-trivial, as anonymity and path validation are inherently contradictory requirements. This paper designs and implements pPHI, a novel protocol, and analyzes pPHI in terms of security and performance.
Mio Kochiyama, Yutaro Yoshinaka, Junji Takemasa, Yuki Koizumi, Toru Hasegawa
ICNP1
2024 A lightweight anonymity protocol at terabit speeds on programmable switches
Yutaro Yoshinaka, Mio Kochiyama, Yuki Koizumi, Junji Takemasa, Toru Hasegawa
Comput. Networks2