Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eglantine Karlé
dblp:385/0311
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction › ranking model
bradley-terry-luce model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Dynamic Ranking with the BTL Model: A Nearest Neighbor based Rank Centrality Method · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Dynamic Ranking with the BTL Model: A Nearest Neighbor based Rank Centrality Method · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Information retrieval › ranking
dynamic ranking |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Dynamic Ranking with the BTL Model: A Nearest Neighbor based Rank Centrality Method · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Dynamic Ranking with the BTL Model: A Nearest Neighbor based Rank Centrality Method · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures › ranking
pairwise comparison ranking |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Dynamic Ranking with the BTL Model: A Nearest Neighbor based Rank Centrality Method · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures
spectral methods |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Dynamic Ranking with the BTL Model: A Nearest Neighbor based Rank Centrality Method · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral methods · 2.0nearest neighbor averaging · 1.3nearest-neighbor averaging · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dynamic Ranking with the BTL Model: A Nearest Neighbor based Rank Centrality MethodabstractMany applications such as recommendation systems or sports tournaments involve pairwise comparisons within a collection of $n$ items, the goal being to aggregate the binary outcomes of the comparisons in order to recover the latent strength and/or global ranking of the items. In recent years, this problem has received significant interest from a theoretical perspective with a number of methods being proposed, along with associated statistical guarantees under the assumption of a suitable generative model. While these results typically collect the pairwise comparisons as one comparison graph $G$, however in many applications -- such as the outcomes of soccer matches during a tournament -- the nature of pairwise outcomes can evolve with time. Theoretical results for such a dynamic setting are relatively limited compared to the aforementioned static setting. We study in this paper an extension of the classic BTL (Bradley-Terry-Luce) model for the static setting to our dynamic setup under the assumption that the probabilities of the pairwise outcomes evolve smoothly over the time domain $[0,1]$. Given a sequence of comparison graphs $(G_{t'})_{t' \in \mathcal{T}}$ on a regular grid $\mathcal{T} \subset [0,1]$, we aim at recovering the latent strengths of the items $w_t^* \in \mathbb{R}^n$ at any time $t \in [0,1]$. To this end, we adapt the Rank Centrality method -- a popular spectral approach for ranking in the static case -- by locally averaging the available data on a suitable neighborhood of $t$. When $(G_{t'})_{t' \in \mathcal{T}}$ is a sequence of Erdös-Renyi graphs, we provide non-asymptotic $\ell_2$ and $\ell_{\infty}$ error bounds for estimating $w_t^*$ which in particular establishes the consistency of this method in terms of $n$, and the grid size $|\mathcal{T}|$. We also complement our theoretical analysis with experiments on real and synthetic data. Eglantine Karlé, Hemant Tyagi |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |