Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Toby Boyne
dblp:385/3170
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 44% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 22% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 22% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | BoFire: Bayesian Optimization Framework Intended for Real Experiments · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 BARK: A Fully Bayesian Tree Kernel for Black-box Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Computational science and engineering
chemistry |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | The Catechol Benchmark: Time-series Solvent Selection Data for Few-shot Machine Learning · NeurIPS 2025 BoFire: Bayesian Optimization Framework Intended for Real Experiments · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | The Catechol Benchmark: Time-series Solvent Selection Data for Few-shot Machine Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel function
tree kernel |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BARK: A Fully Bayesian Tree Kernel for Black-box Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | The Catechol Benchmark: Time-series Solvent Selection Data for Few-shot Machine Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | BARK: A Fully Bayesian Tree Kernel for Black-box Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transfer learning · 1.7regression · 1.7feature engineering · 1.7design of experiments · 1.7bayesian optimization · 1.7active learning · 1.7markov chain monte carlo · 0.9bayesian additive regression trees · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | BARK: A Fully Bayesian Tree Kernel for Black-box OptimizationabstractWe perform Bayesian optimization using a Gaussian process perspective on Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART). Our BART Kernel (BARK) uses tree agreement to define a posterior over piecewise-constant functions, and we explore the space of tree kernels using a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Where BART only samples functions, the resulting BARK model obtains samples of Gaussian processes defining distributions over functions, which allow us to build acquisition functions for Bayesian optimization. Our tree-based approach enables global optimization over the surrogate, even for mixed-feature spaces. Moreover, where many previous tree-based kernels provide uncertainty quantification over function values, our sampling scheme captures uncertainty over the tree structure itself. Our experiments show the strong performance of BARK on both synthetic and applied benchmarks, due to the combination of our fully Bayesian surrogate and the optimization procedure. Toby Boyne, Jose Pablo Folch, Robert M. Lee, Behrang Shafei, Ruth Misener |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | The Catechol Benchmark: Time-series Solvent Selection Data for Few-shot Machine LearningabstractMachine learning has promised to change the landscape of laboratory chemistry, with impressive results in molecular property prediction and reaction retro-synthesis. However, chemical datasets are often inaccessible to the machine learning community as they tend to require cleaning, thorough understanding of the chemistry, or are simply not available. In this paper, we introduce a novel dataset for yield prediction, providing the first-ever transient flow dataset for machine learning benchmarking, covering over 1200 process conditions. While previous datasets focus on discrete parameters, our experimental set-up allow us to sample a large number of continuous process conditions, generating new challenges for machine learning models. We focus on solvent selection, a task that is particularly difficult to model theoretically and therefore ripe for machine learning applications. We showcase benchmarking for regression algorithms, transfer-learning approaches, feature engineering, and active learning, with important applications towards solvent replacement and sustainable manufacturing. Toby Boyne, Juan S. Campos, Rebecca D. Langdon, Jixiang Qing, Yilin Xie, Shiqiang Zhang, Calvin Tsay, Ruth Misener, Daniel W. Davies, Kim E. Jelfs, Sarah Boyall, Thomas M. Dixon, Linden Schrecker, Jose Pablo Folch |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2025 | BoFire: Bayesian Optimization Framework Intended for Real ExperimentsabstractOur open-source Python package BoFire combines Bayesian Optimization (BO) with other design of experiments (DoE) strategies focusing on developing and optimizing new chemistry. Previous BO implementations, for example as they exist in the literature or software, require substantial adaptation for effective real-world deployment in chemical industry. BoFire provides a rich feature-set with extensive configurability and realizes our vision of fast-tracking research contributions into industrial use via maintainable open-source software. Owing to quality-of-life features like JSON-serializability of problem formulations, BoFire enables seamless integration of BO into RESTful APIs, a common architecture component for both self-driving laboratories and human-in-the-loop setups. This paper discusses the differences between BoFire and other BO implementations and outlines ways that BO research needs to be adapted for real-world use in a chemistry setting. Johannes P. Dürholt, Thomas S. Asche, Johanna Kleinekorte, Gabriel Mancino-Ball, Benjamin Schiller, Simon Sung, Julian Keupp, Aaron Osburg, Toby Boyne, Ruth Misener, Rosona Eldred, Chrysoula Kappatou, Robert M. Lee, Dominik Linzner, Wagner Steuer Costa, David Walz, Niklas Wulkow, Behrang Shafei |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 9 |