Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Benjamin Shiue-Hal Chou

dblp:387/2928 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Audio and music processing › music analysis
music performance analysis
0.912025
Detecting Music Performance Errors with Transformers · AAAI 2025
Audio and music processing
music transcription
0.912025
Detecting Music Performance Errors with Transformers · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.312025
Detecting Music Performance Errors with Transformers · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 1.7synthetic data generation · 1.7latent alignment · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Detecting Music Performance Errors with Transformers
abstract
Beginner musicians often struggle to identify specific errors in their performances, such as playing incorrect notes or rhythms. There are two limitations in existing tools for music error detection: (1) Existing approaches rely on automatic alignment; therefore, they are prone to errors caused by small deviations between alignment targets; (2) There is insufficient data to train music error detection models, resulting in over-reliance on heuristics. To address (1), we propose a novel transformer model, Polytune, that takes audio inputs and outputs annotated music scores. This model can be trained end-to-end to implicitly align and compare performance audio with music scores through latent space representations. To address (2), we present a novel data generation technique capable of creating large-scale synthetic music error datasets. Our approach achieves a 64.1% average Error Detection F1 score, improving upon prior work by 40 percentage points across 14 instruments. Additionally, our model can handle multiple instruments compared with existing transcription methods repurposed for music error detection.
Benjamin Shiue-Hal Chou, Purvish Jajal, Nicholas Eliopoulos, Tim Nadolsky, Cheng-Yun Yang, Nikita Ravi, James C. Davis 0001, Kristen Yeon-Ji Yun, Yung-Hsiang Lu
AAAI1
2025 Token Turing Machines are Efficient Vision Models
abstract
We propose Vision Token Turing Machines (ViTTM), an efficient, low-latency, memory-augmented Vision Transformer (ViT). Our approach builds on Neural Turing Machines (NTM) and Token Turing Machines (TTM), which were applied to NLP and sequential visual understanding tasks. ViTTMs are designed for non-sequential computer vision tasks such as image classification and segmentation. Our model creates two sets of tokens: process tokens and memory tokens; process tokens pass through encoder blocks and read-write from memory tokens at each encoder block in the network, allowing them to store and retrieve information from memory. By ensuring that there are fewer process tokens, we are able to reduce the inference time of the network while maintaining its accuracy. On ImageNet-1K, the state-of-the-art ViT-B has median latency of 529.5 ms and 81.0% accuracy, while our ViTTM-B is 56% faster (234.1 ms), with 2.4× fewer FLOPs, with an accuracy of 82.9%. On ADE20K semantic segmentation, ViT-B achieves 45.65 mIoU at 13.8 frames per second (FPS) whereas our ViTTM-B model achieves 45.17 mIoU with 26.8 FPS (+94%).
Purvish Jajal, Nicholas Eliopoulos, Benjamin Shiue-Hal Chou, George K. Thiravathukal, James C. Davis 0001, Yung-Hsiang Lu
WACV3