Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jiangrui Kang

dblp:387/4420 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 50% Learning paradigms · 25% Trustworthy machine learning · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.812024
Enhancing Semi-Supervised Learning via Representative and Diverse Sample Selection · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
representative sampling
0.812024
Enhancing Semi-Supervised Learning via Representative and Diverse Sample Selection · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
sample selection
0.812024
Enhancing Semi-Supervised Learning via Representative and Diverse Sample Selection · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.812024
Enhancing Semi-Supervised Learning via Representative and Diverse Sample Selection · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

maximum mean discrepancy · 0.8frank-wolfe algorithm · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Enhancing Semi-Supervised Learning via Representative and Diverse Sample Selection
abstract
Semi-Supervised Learning (SSL) has become a preferred paradigm in many deep learning tasks, which reduces the need for human labor. Previous studies primarily focus on effectively utilising the labelled and unlabeled data to improve performance. However, we observe that how to select samples for labelling also significantly impacts performance, particularly under extremely low-budget settings. The sample selection task in SSL has been under-explored for a long time. To fill in this gap, we propose a Representative and Diverse Sample Selection approach (RDSS). By adopting a modified Frank-Wolfe algorithm to minimise a novel criterion $\alpha$-Maximum Mean Discrepancy ($\alpha$-MMD), RDSS samples a representative and diverse subset for annotation from the unlabeled data. We demonstrate that minimizing $\alpha$-MMD enhances the generalization ability of low-budget learning. Experimental results show that RDSS consistently improves the performance of several popular SSL frameworks and outperforms the state-of-the-art sample selection approaches used in Active Learning (AL) and Semi-Supervised Active Learning (SSAL), even with constrained annotation budgets. Our code is available at [RDSS](https://github.com/YanhuiAILab/RDSS).
Qian Shao, Jiangrui Kang, Qiyuan Chen 0003, Zepeng Li 0002, Yiwen Cao, Jiajuan Liang, Jian Wu 0001
NeurIPS2