Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Theo King

dblp:387/4512 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Multi-agent systems · 33%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Knowledge graphs · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
agentic AI
1.012026
AgentGraph: Trace-to-Graph Platform for Interactive Analysis and Robustness Testing in Agentic AI Systems · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › safety evaluation
red teaming
1.012026
AgentSeer: Visualizing and Evaluating Temporal Actions in Agentic AI Systems · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness evaluation
1.012026
AgentGraph: Trace-to-Graph Platform for Interactive Analysis and Robustness Testing in Agentic AI Systems · AAAI 2026
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction
0.312026
AgentGraph: Trace-to-Graph Platform for Interactive Analysis and Robustness Testing in Agentic AI Systems · AAAI 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
jailbreak attack
0.312026
AgentSeer: Visualizing and Evaluating Temporal Actions in Agentic AI Systems · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rule-based parser · 3.0dual graph decomposition · 3.0automated red teaming · 3.0trace-grounded failure detection · 2.0interactive knowledge graph · 2.0causal attribution · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 AgentSeer: Visualizing and Evaluating Temporal Actions in Agentic AI Systems
abstract
We present AgentSeer, an interactive observability framework for agentic AI systems. Unlike conventional tracing tools that expose raw spans or model-centric metrics, AgentSeer introduces a dual graph decomposition constructed through a deterministic rule-based parser: a temporal action graph, where each prompt or tool invocation is represented as a distinct action, and a component graph capturing architectural relations among agents, tools, and memory modules. Beyond visualization, AgentSeer enables action-level red teaming, where jailbreak payloads are systematically attached to every action node (including agent messages, tool calls, and memory retrievals) to uncover vulnerabilities invisible to model-level testing. Our demonstration features a six-agent hierarchical testbed with interactive visualization and deployment-oriented safety evaluation applied directly on the same prompts and contexts, systematically revealing high-risk interactions, context-dependent vulnerabilities, and emergent behaviors. By combining structured decomposition, automated red teaming, and rule-based reliability, AgentSeer establishes a safety-first methodology for observability in multi-agent AI.
Ilham Wicaksono, Zekun Wu 0003, Theo King, Adriano S. Koshiyama, Philip C. Treleaven
AAAI4
2026 AgentGraph: Trace-to-Graph Platform for Interactive Analysis and Robustness Testing in Agentic AI Systems
abstract
Modern Agentic AI systems plan, reason, and act across multiple steps, creating execution patterns that are difficult to interpret. Existing observability platforms track prompt I/O and operational metrics but require manual inspection of traces to reconstruct structure and reasoning. We present AgentGraph, which converts execution logs into interactive knowledge graphs and actionable insights. Nodes represent agents, tasks, tools, data inputs/outputs, and humans, while typed edges capture relations such as inputs consumed, tasks delegated or sequenced, tools required or used, outputs produced and delivered, and interventions from agents or humans. Each graph element links to its exact trace span, ensuring verifiability. Building on this representation, AgentGraph enables two analyses: qualitative trace-grounded failure detection and optimisation recommendations, and quantitative robustness evaluation via perturbation testing and causal attribution.
Zekun Wu 0003, Seonglae Cho, Cristian E. Muñoz Villalobos, Theo King, Umar Mohammed, Emre Kazim, María Pérez-Ortiz 0001, Sahan Bulathwela, Adriano S. Koshiyama
AAAI4