Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Severin Jager

dblp:389/6979 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0007-9638-6022ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Memory systems · 61% Electronic design automation · 30% Integrated circuit design · 9%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › design automation tools › accelerator design automation
accelerator design space exploration
0.812024
OPTIMA: Design-Space Exploration of Discharge-Based In-SRAM Computing: Quantifying Energy-Accuracy Trade-offs · DAC 2024
Memory systems › processing-in-memory › computing-in-memory
in-SRAM computing
0.812024
OPTIMA: Design-Space Exploration of Discharge-Based In-SRAM Computing: Quantifying Energy-Accuracy Trade-offs · DAC 2024
Memory systems
processing-in-memory
0.812024
OPTIMA: Design-Space Exploration of Discharge-Based In-SRAM Computing: Quantifying Energy-Accuracy Trade-offs · DAC 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

design space exploration · 0.8bitline discharge modeling · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 OPTIMA: Design-Space Exploration of Discharge-Based In-SRAM Computing: Quantifying Energy-Accuracy Trade-offs
abstract
In-SRAM computing promises energy efficiency, but circuit nonlinearities and PVT variations pose major challenges in designing robust accelerators. To address this, we introduce OPTIMA, a modeling framework that aids in analyzing bitline discharge and power consumption in 6T-SRAM-based accelerators. It provides insights into limiting factors and enables fast design-space exploration of circuit configurations. Leveraging OPTIMA for in-SRAM multiplications exhibits ~100 × simulation speed-up while maintaining an RMS modeling error of 0.88 mV. Exploration yields an optimized multiplier with 1.05 pJ energy consumption per 4-bit operation and classification accuracies of 71.8% (top-1) and 90.4% (top-5) for ImageNet and 92.5% for CIFAR-10 datasets respectively when applied in quantized DNNs. To further support research and development efforts, we have made our OPTIMAptima tool flow available as open source [https://github.com/sevjaeg/optima].
Saeed Seyedfaraji, Severin Jager, Salar Shakibhamedan, Asad Aftab, Semeen Rehman
DAC2