Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Stenzel

dblp:39/2693 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
disassembly
0.012000
Flexible Handling in Disassembly with Screwnail Indentation · ICRA 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

upper bound analysis · 0.0kinematically admissible velocity field · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Flexible Handling in Disassembly with Screwnail Indentation
abstract
This paper presents a cost-effective solution - screwnail indentation for disassembly. It is shown that the screwnail indentation can overcome the geometry uncertainties of used products. A disassembly tool, using the screwnail as the end effector, is introduced. The disassembly task is decomposed into screwnail indentation process, task execution process, and separating process. Based on a kinematically admissible velocity field, an upper-bound analysis is performed for the screwnail indentation process and validated with an experimental set-up. The results can be applied to flexible disassembly.
Bing-Ran Zuo, Alexander Stenzel, Günther Seliger
ICRA2