Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fabiano Cattaneo

dblp:39/3380 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 74% Software maintenance and evolution · 20% Empirical software engineering · 6%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data integration and cleaning · 79% Data models and query languages · 21%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning › data warehouse
data warehouse design
0.012001
Designing data marts for data warehouses · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2001
Requirements engineering and software design
requirements specification
0.012000
Managing software artifacts on the Web with Labyrinth · ICSE 2000
Software maintenance and evolution › software process improvement
capability maturity model
0.011995
An Experience in Process Assessment · ICSE 1995
Requirements engineering and software design › software process
software process assessment
0.011995
An Experience in Process Assessment · ICSE 1995
Requirements engineering and software design
goal-oriented requirements engineering
0.012001
Designing data marts for data warehouses · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

goal/question/metric paradigm · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Designing data marts for data warehouses
abstract
Data warehouses are databases devoted to analytical processing. They are used to support decision-making activities in most modern business settings, when complex data sets have to be studied and analyzed. The technology for analytical processing assumes that data are presented in the form of simple data marts, consisting of a well-identified collection of facts and data analysis dimensions (star schema). Despite the wide diffusion of data warehouse technology and concepts, we still miss methods that help and guide the designer in identifying and extracting such data marts out of an enterprisewide information system, covering the upstream, requirement-driven stages of the design process. Many existing methods and tools support the activities related to the efficient implementation of data marts on top of specialized technology (such as the ROLAP or MOLAP data servers). This paper presents a method to support the identification and design of data marts. The method is based on three basic steps. A first top-down step makes it possible to elicit and consolidate user requirements and expectations. This is accomplished by exploiting a goal-oriented process based on the Goal/Question/Metric paradigm developed at the University of Maryland. Ideal data marts are derived from user requirements. The second bottom-up step extracts candidate data marts
Angela Bonifati, Fabiano Cattaneo, Stefano Ceri, Alfonso Fuggetta, Stefano Paraboschi
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol.2
2000 Managing software artifacts on the Web with Labyrinth
abstract
Software developers are increasingly exploiting the Web as a document management system. However, the Web has some limitations, since it is not aware of the structure and semantics associated to pieces of information (e.g., the fact that a document is a requirement specification) and of the semantics of relationships between pieces of information (e.g., the fact that a requirement specification document may be associated to some design specification document). In the Labyrinth project we enhance the capabilities of the Web as a document management system by means of a semantic model (called schema, in analogy with database schemas), which is associated to Web documents. This model is itself a Web document and can be accessed and navigated through a simple Web browser.
Fabiano Cattaneo, Elisabetta Di Nitto, Alfonso Fuggetta, Luigi Lavazza, Giuseppe Valetto
ICSE1
1995 An Experience in Process Assessment
abstract
This paper presents an experience in software process assessment that has been conducted in a mid-size Italian company.The assessment has been carried out using the CMM(Capability Maturity Model) and taking into account also the indications offered by QIP (Quality Improvement Paradigm).The paper discusses the resr.dtso ftheassessmen tandthe lessons we have learned from running it.It particular, it argues that it is necessa~to broaden the scope of assessment methods, and to evaluate the applicability to software processes of the experiences, methods, and techniques developed in other business domains.
Fabiano Cattaneo, Alfonso Fuggetta, Luigi Lavazza
ICSE1