Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anna Lena Rotthaler

dblp:390/3286 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-7785-7110ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Usable security · 67% Systems and software security · 33%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Health and well-being technologies · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Usable security › security education
security advice
0.912025
"It's Time. Time for Digital Security.": An End User Study on Actionable Security and Privacy Advice · SP 2025
Usable security
security behavior
0.912025
"It's Time. Time for Digital Security.": An End User Study on Actionable Security and Privacy Advice · SP 2025
Systems and software security › vulnerability management
vulnerability disclosure
0.912025
Poster: Computer Security Researchers' Experiences with Vulnerability Disclosures · CCS 2025
Health and well-being technologies › behavior change
habit formation
0.312025
"It's Time. Time for Digital Security.": An End User Study on Actionable Security and Privacy Advice · SP 2025
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.312025
Poster: Computer Security Researchers' Experiences with Vulnerability Disclosures · CCS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 1.7mobile app · 1.7interview study · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 From Thrift Stores to Digital Storefronts: Users' Perspectives on Privacy and Security of Online Second-Hand Shopping in Germany
Darya Zarkalam, Anna Lena Rotthaler, Lucy Simko, Yasemin Acar
SOUPS2
2025 Poster: Computer Security Researchers' Experiences with Vulnerability Disclosures
abstract
Vulnerability disclosures are necessary to improve the security of our digital ecosystem. However, they can also be challenging for researchers: it may be hard to find out who the affected parties even are, or how to contact them. Researchers may be ignored or face adversity when disclosing vulnerabilities. We investigate researchers' experiences with vulnerability disclosures, extract best practices, and make recommendations for researchers, institutions that employ them, industry, and regulators to enable effective vulnerability disclosures.
Harshini Sri Ramulu, Anna Lena Rotthaler, Jost Rossel, Rachel Gonzalez Rodriguez, Dominik Wermke, Sascha Fahl, Tadayoshi Kohno, Juraj Somorovsky, Yasemin Acar
CCS2
2025 "It's Time. Time for Digital Security.": An End User Study on Actionable Security and Privacy Advice
abstract
Digital security advice is the focus of much research, with unsatisfying results: End users do not follow experts' security advice, and users and experts struggle to prioritize existing advice. Several studies point out that users are over-whelmed by the amount of available security advice, and make recommendations on how to improve existing advice. Nevertheless, we still do not know how to effectively give security advice. Inspired by daily habit apps, we developed a set of 30 pieces of short and actionable advice, and the Security App, an Android smartphone app to provide this advice to end users, to reduce mental effort, and to build secure habits. We conducted a 30-day online end-user (N=74) study to evaluate whether the set of advice is actionable and meaningful to users, whether users adopt the advice, and whether the app has an impact on security awareness and behavior. Our results show that the app is an appropriate tool to provide security advice to end users. Participants perceive the majority of tasks as comprehensible, actionable, and useful, and we show that the app in fact introduces secure behaviors. Our results can serve as a basis for future research on security advice and creating secure habits, and the possibility to effectively teach secure behavior.
Anna Lena Rotthaler, Harshini Sri Ramulu, Lucy Simko, Sascha Fahl, Yasemin Acar
SP1