Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mathieu Bazinet

dblp:390/5682 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 60% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 40%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.912025
Generalization Bounds via Meta-Learned Model Representations: PAC-Bayes and Sample Compression Hypernetworks · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › meta-learning
hypernetwork-based meta-learning
0.912025
Generalization Bounds via Meta-Learned Model Representations: PAC-Bayes and Sample Compression Hypernetworks · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.912025
Generalization Bounds via Meta-Learned Model Representations: PAC-Bayes and Sample Compression Hypernetworks · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
PAC-Bayes bounds
0.912025
Generalization Bounds via Meta-Learned Model Representations: PAC-Bayes and Sample Compression Hypernetworks · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
sample compression bounds
0.912025
Generalization Bounds via Meta-Learned Model Representations: PAC-Bayes and Sample Compression Hypernetworks · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sample compression · 0.9hypernetwork · 0.9PAC-Bayes · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Sample Compression Unleashed: New Generalization Bounds for Real Valued Losses
abstract
The sample compression theory provides generalization guarantees for predictors that can be fully defined using a subset of the training dataset and a (short) message string, generally defined as a binary sequence. Previous works provided generalization bounds for the zero-one loss, which is restrictive notably when applied to deep learning approaches. In this paper, we present a general framework for deriving new sample compression bounds that hold for real-valued unbounded losses. Using the Pick-To-Learn (P2L) meta-algorithm, which transforms the training method of any machine-learning predictor to yield sample-compressed predictors, we empirically demonstrate the tightness of the bounds and their versatility by evaluating them on random forests and multiple types of neural networks.
Mathieu Bazinet, Valentina Zantedeschi, Pascal Germain
AISTATS1
2025 Generalization Bounds via Meta-Learned Model Representations: PAC-Bayes and Sample Compression Hypernetworks
abstract
Both PAC-Bayesian and Sample Compress learning frameworks have been shown instrumental for deriving tight (non-vacuous) generalization bounds for neural networks. We leverage these results in a meta-learning scheme, relying on a hypernetwork that outputs the parameters of a downstream predictor from a dataset input. The originality of our approach lies in the investigated hypernetwork architectures that encode the dataset before decoding the parameters: (1) a PAC-Bayesian encoder that expresses a posterior distribution over a latent space, (2) a Sample Compress encoder that selects a small sample of the dataset input along with a message from a discrete set, and (3) a hybrid between both approaches motivated by a new Sample Compress theorem handling continuous messages. The latter theorem exploits the pivotal information transiting at the encoder-decoder junction in order to compute generalization guarantees for each downstream predictor obtained by our meta-learning scheme.
Benjamin Leblanc, Mathieu Bazinet, Nathaniel D'Amours, Alexandre Drouin, Pascal Germain
ICML2