Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luna K. Qiu

dblp:391/4761 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-6796-4494ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Accessibility and assistive technology · 50% Human-AI interaction · 50%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Accessibility and assistive technology › screen reader accessibility
screen reader users
2.022026
Programmers Who Use Screen Readers in the Vibe Coding Era: Adaptation, Empowerment, and New Accessibility Landscape · CHI 2026
From Struggle to Success: Context-Aware Guidance for Screen Reader Users in Computer Use · CHI 2026
Human-AI interaction › AI-mediated work
AI-assisted programming
1.012026
Programmers Who Use Screen Readers in the Vibe Coding Era: Adaptation, Empowerment, and New Accessibility Landscape · CHI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents
large language model assistant
0.312026
From Struggle to Success: Context-Aware Guidance for Screen Reader Users in Computer Use · CHI 2026
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
0.312026
Programmers Who Use Screen Readers in the Vibe Coding Era: Adaptation, Empowerment, and New Accessibility Landscape · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

longitudinal study · 2.0large language model · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 From Struggle to Success: Context-Aware Guidance for Screen Reader Users in Computer Use
abstract
Equal access to digital technologies is critical for education, employment, and social participation. However, mainstream interfaces are visually oriented, creating steep learning curves and frequent obstacles for screen reader users, and limiting their independence and opportunities. Existing support is inadequate—tutorials mainly target sighted users, while human assistance lacks real-time availability. We introduce AskEase, an on-demand AI assistant that provides step-by-step, screen reader user-friendly guidance for computer use. AskEase manages multiple sources of context to infer user intent and deliver precise, situation-specific guidance. Its seamless interaction design minimizes disruption and reduces the effort of seeking help. We demonstrated its effectiveness through representative usage scenarios and robustness tests. In a within-subjects study with 12 screen reader users, AskEase significantly improved task success while reducing perceived workload, including physical demand, effort, and frustration. These results demonstrate the potential of LLM-powered assistants to promote accessible computing and expand opportunities for users with visual impairments.
Zilong Wang 0006, Luna K. Qiu, Siming Chen 0001, Yuqing Yang 0001
CHI4
2026 Programmers Who Use Screen Readers in the Vibe Coding Era: Adaptation, Empowerment, and New Accessibility Landscape
abstract
Generative AI agents are reshaping human-computer interaction, shifting users from direct task execution to supervising machine-driven actions, especially the rise of “vibe coding” in programming. Yet little is known about how programmers who use screen readers interact with AI code assistants in practice. We conducted a longitudinal study with 16 blind and low-vision programmers. Participants completed a GitHub Copilot tutorial, engaged with a programming task, and provided initial feedback. After two weeks of AI-assisted programming, follow-ups examined how their practices and perceptions evolved. Our findings show that code assistants enhanced programming efficiency and bridged accessibility gaps. However, participants struggled to convey intent, interpret AI outputs, and manage multiple views while maintaining situational awareness. They showed diverse preferences for accessibility features, expressed a need to balance automation with control, and encountered barriers when learning to use these tools. Furthermore, we propose design principles and recommendations for more accessible and inclusive human-AI collaborations.
Luna K. Qiu, Zeyu Wang 0005, Zilong Wang 0006, Yuqing Yang 0001
CHI2