Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joseph Lunderville

dblp:391/8257 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-0253-9227ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Quantum computing and quantum information · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program analysis › static analysis › abstract interpretation
relational analysis
0.912025
Linear and Non-linear Relational Analyses for Quantum Program Optimization · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum circuit optimization
0.912025
Linear and Non-linear Relational Analyses for Quantum Program Optimization · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum programming
quantum program optimization
0.912025
Linear and Non-linear Relational Analyses for Quantum Program Optimization · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sum-over-paths · 1.7loop invariant inference · 1.7abstract interpretation · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Linear and Non-linear Relational Analyses for Quantum Program Optimization
abstract
The phase folding optimization is a circuit optimization used in many quantum compilers as a fast and effective way of reducing the number of high-cost gates in a quantum circuit. However, existing formulations of the optimization rely on an exact, linear algebraic representation of the circuit, restricting the optimization to being performed on straightline quantum circuits or basic blocks in a larger quantum program. We show that the phase folding optimization can be re-cast as an affine relation analysis , which allows the direct application of classical techniques for affine relations to extend phase folding to quantum programs with arbitrarily complicated classical control flow including nested loops and procedure calls. Through the lens of relational analysis, we show that the optimization can be powered-up by substituting other classical relational domains, particularly ones for non-linear relations which are useful in analyzing circuits involving classical arithmetic. To increase the precision of our analysis and infer non-linear relations from gate sets involving only linear operations – such as Clifford+ t – we show that the sum-over-paths technique can be used to extract precise symbolic transition relations for straightline circuits. Our experiments show that our methods are able to generate and use non-trivial loop invariants for quantum program optimization, as well as achieve some optimizations of common circuits which were previously attainable only by hand.
Matthew Amy, Joseph Lunderville
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.2