Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bhavesh Shrimali

dblp:393/4330 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 44% Deep learning architectures and training · 44% Learning theory · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence guarantees
0.912025
Optimization for Neural Operators can Benefit from Width · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural operator
0.912025
Optimization for Neural Operators can Benefit from Width · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
approximation theory
0.312025
Optimization for Neural Operators can Benefit from Width · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

smoothness · 0.9restricted strong convexity · 0.9gradient descent · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Optimization for Neural Operators can Benefit from Width
abstract
Neural Operators that directly learn mappings between function spaces, such as Deep Operator Networks (DONs) and Fourier Neural Operators (FNOs), have received considerable attention. Despite the universal approximation guarantees for DONs and FNOs, there is currently no optimization convergence guarantee for learning such networks using gradient descent (GD). In this paper, we address this open problem by presenting a unified framework for optimization based on GD and applying it to establish convergence guarantees for both DONs and FNOs. In particular, we show that the losses associated with both of these neural operators satisfy two conditions—restricted strong convexity (RSC) and smoothness—that guarantee a decrease on their loss values due to GD. Remarkably, these two conditions are satisfied for each neural operator due to different reasons associated with the architectural differences of the respective models. One takeaway that emerges from the theory is that wider networks benefit optimization convergence guarantees for both DONs and FNOs. We present empirical results on canonical operator learning problems to support our theoretical results and find that larger widths benefit training.
Pedro Cisneros-Velarde, Bhavesh Shrimali, Arindam Banerjee 0001
ICML2