Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arthur Leung
dblp:393/4432
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 39% Software maintenance and evolution · 30% Software testing · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution
issue tracking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SPICE: An Automated SWE-Bench Labeling Pipeline for Issue Clarity, Test Coverage, and Effort Estimation · ASE 2025 |
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SPICE: An Automated SWE-Bench Labeling Pipeline for Issue Clarity, Test Coverage, and Effort Estimation · ASE 2025 |
Software testing
test coverage |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SPICE: An Automated SWE-Bench Labeling Pipeline for Issue Clarity, Test Coverage, and Effort Estimation · ASE 2025 |
Empirical software engineering
software effort estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | SPICE: An Automated SWE-Bench Labeling Pipeline for Issue Clarity, Test Coverage, and Effort Estimation · ASE 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rationale-driven prompting · 0.9multi-pass consensus · 0.9large language model · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SPICE: An Automated SWE-Bench Labeling Pipeline for Issue Clarity, Test Coverage, and Effort EstimationabstractHigh-quality labeled datasets are crucial for training and evaluating foundation models in software engineering, but creating them is often prohibitively expensive and labor-intensive. We introduce SPICE, a scalable, automated pipeline for labeling SWE-bench-style datasets with annotations for issue clarity, test coverage, and effort estimation. SPICE combines context-aware code navigation, rationale-driven prompting, and multi-pass consensus to produce labels that closely approximate expert annotations. SPICE’s design was informed by our own experience and frustration in labeling more than 800 instances from SWE-Gym. SPICE achieves strong agreement with human-labeled SWE-bench Verified data while reducing the cost of labeling 1,000 instances from around $100,000 (manual annotation) to only $5.10. These results demonstrate SPICE’s potential to enable cost-effective, large-scale dataset creation for SE-focused FMs. To support the community, we release both SPICE tool and SPICE Bench, a new dataset of 6,802 SPICE-labeled instances curated from 291 open-source projects in SWE-Gym (over 13x larger than SWE-bench Verified). Gustavo Ansaldi Oliva, Gopi Krishnan Rajbahadur, Aaditya Bhatia, Haoxiang Zhang 0001, Zhilong Chen, Arthur Leung, Dayi Lin, Boyuan Chen 0002, Ahmed E. Hassan |
ASE | 7 |