Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Federico Bomba

dblp:394/8881 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-0165-0039ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Human-AI interaction · 89% Design research and methods · 11%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction
generative AI
0.812024
The Choreographer-Performer Continuum: A Diffraction Tool to Illuminate Authorship in More Than Human Co-Performances · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2024
Human-AI interaction
human-AI co-creation
0.312025
Agency and authorship in AI art: Transformational practices for epistemic troubles · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2025
Design research and methods
art-based research
0.212024
The Choreographer-Performer Continuum: A Diffraction Tool to Illuminate Authorship in More Than Human Co-Performances · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

agential realism · 2.5speech act theory · 1.7interviews · 1.7case study · 1.7retrospective case study · 0.8fine-tuning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Agency and authorship in AI art: Transformational practices for epistemic troubles
abstract
ABSTRACT The integration of Generative AI into artistic practices is not only expanding the possibilities for creative expression but also challenging foundational concepts such as agency and authorship. Combining Agential Realism and Speech Act Theory, this paper presents a case study involving three internationally recognised artists with extensive experience using text and image-based models. It combines in-depth interviews with critical readings of selected artworks to explore how generative AI Art emerges from the intra-actions between artists, data, and algorithms. Our contribution unfolds along two complementary directions. Firstly, we engage with epistemological debates by conceptualising agency and authorship as relational and distributed phenomena. Secondly, we challenge the notion of AI as a mere tool and advocate for design approaches that foreground shared authorship. By focusing on studio-level practices, this paper offers situated insights into artist–AI interaction, expands our understanding of de-individualised knowledge production, and points toward systems that support responsible co-creation.
Federico Bomba, Antonella De Angeli
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.1
2024 The Choreographer-Performer Continuum: A Diffraction Tool to Illuminate Authorship in More Than Human Co-Performances
abstract
The design of robust and trustworthy Generative AI (GenAI) requires a deep understanding of the agencies emerging from human interactions with them. To contribute to this goal, we retrospectively studied an art project involving a visual artist, a computer scientist, an artistic director, and a generative model (GPT-2). The model was fine-tuned with trip reports describing the experience of eating psychedelic mushrooms. Building on agential realism, we analysed the co-performance between the artist and the model as their agency moved along the choreographer-performer continuum. Results reveal ontological surprises, leading to the proposal of entangled authorship to de-individualise the production of knowledge from a More Than Human perspective. The paper illustrates how art can expose different forms of relationships, challenging the idea of GenAI as just a tool that simplifies or replaces human labour. We conclude by emphasising the transformational potential of GenAI for novel modes of engagement between humans and machines.
Federico Bomba, María Menéndez-Blanco, Paolo Grigis, Michele Cremaschi, Antonella De Angeli
ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact.1