Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tien Ngoc Luu
dblp:395/1375
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 56% Vision and language · 28% Efficient and distributed learning · 8% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
continual relation extraction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Adaptive Prompting for Continual Relation Extraction: A Within-Task Variance Perspective · AAAI 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
prompt learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Adaptive Prompting for Continual Relation Extraction: A Within-Task Variance Perspective · AAAI 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Adaptive Prompting for Continual Relation Extraction: A Within-Task Variance Perspective · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Adaptive Prompting for Continual Relation Extraction: A Within-Task Variance Perspective · AAAI 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompt tuning
prefix tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Adaptive Prompting for Continual Relation Extraction: A Within-Task Variance Perspective · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prefix-tuning · 0.9mixture of experts · 0.9generative model · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Adaptive Prompting for Continual Relation Extraction: A Within-Task Variance PerspectiveabstractTo address catastrophic forgetting in Continual Relation Extraction (CRE), many current approaches rely on memory buffers to rehearse previously learned knowledge while acquiring new tasks. Recently, prompt-based methods have emerged as potent alternatives to rehearsal-based strategies, demonstrating strong empirical performance. However, upon analyzing existing prompt-based approaches for CRE, we identified several critical limitations, such as inaccurate prompt selection, inadequate mechanisms for mitigating forgetting in shared parameters, and suboptimal handling of cross-task and within-task variances. To overcome these challenges, we draw inspiration from the relationship between prefix tuning and mixture of experts, proposing a novel approach that employs a prompt pool for each task, capturing variations within each task while enhancing cross-task variances. Furthermore, we incorporate a generative model to consolidate prior knowledge within shared parameters, eliminating the need for explicit data storage. Extensive experiments validate the efficacy of our approach, demonstrating superior performance over state-of-the-art prompt-based and rehearsal-free methods in continual relation extraction. Minh Le, Tien Ngoc Luu, An Nguyen The, Thanh-Thien Le, Tung Thanh Nguyen, Ngo Van Linh 0001, Thien Huu Nguyen |
AAAI | 2 |