Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Benjamin Klieger

dblp:395/4085 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 50% Empirical software engineering · 50%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computing education
large language model evaluation
0.912025
ResearchCodeBench: Benchmarking LLMs on Implementing Novel Machine Learning Research Code · NeurIPS 2025
Compilers and program optimization
code generation
0.912025
ResearchCodeBench: Benchmarking LLMs on Implementing Novel Machine Learning Research Code · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ResearchCodeBench: Benchmarking LLMs on Implementing Novel Machine Learning Research Code
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in transforming machine learning research, yet their capability to faithfully implement genuinely novel ideas from recent research papers—ideas unseen during pretraining—remains unclear. We introduce ResearchCodeBench, a benchmark that evaluates LLMs’ ability to translate cutting-edge ML contributions from top 2024-2025 research papers into executable code. We assessed 30+ proprietary and open-source LLMs, finding that even the best models correctly implement less than 40% of the code. We present empirical findings on performance comparison, contamination, and error patterns. By providing a rigorous evaluation platform, ResearchCodeBench enables continuous understanding and advancement of LLM-driven innovation in research code generation.
Tianyu Hua, Harper Hua, Violet Xiang, Benjamin Klieger, Sang T. Truong, Weixin Liang, Fan-Yun Sun, Nick Haber
NeurIPS4